Accepted libocxl 1.2.1-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 17:08:43 +0200
Source: libocxl
Architecture: source
Version: 1.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Frédéric Bonnard <frediz@debian.org>
Changed-By: Frédéric Bonnard <frediz@debian.org>
Changes:
libocxl (1.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Debian Janitor ]
* Bump debhelper from old 11 to 12.
* Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
* Set upstream metadata fields: Bug-Database, Bug-Submit, Repository,
Repository-Browse.
.
[ Frédéric Bonnard ]
* Update to new upstream version 1.2.1.
* Add Build-Depends-Package field to symbol file
* Increase compatibility level to the recommended one
* Add Rules-Requires-Root field to d/control
* Update d/watch format
* Rewrite to pick files directly from install dir
* Disable file path fixing in the build
* Update d/copyright info
* Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.0.1
Checksums-Sha1:
fd0df6dc7bc73f8be1e23726dc584f0511c80a64 2089 libocxl_1.2.1-1.dsc
add72b58dcdebe3bdacc8a0ed3d0486367058729 71096 libocxl_1.2.1.orig.tar.xz
a05e3524d7e7c8dd61d9561c0ac041e81d1acda7 2964 libocxl_1.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
79a7d0a7bbafd62f2e3d7302ab5afebaaaeac83cf32acdb0d900ee7453ff6adf 2089 libocxl_1.2.1-1.dsc
583e041a81cc2c5ddf8ba197954a4af8c44312768af5ef14cd363d1cb5e99d29 71096 libocxl_1.2.1.orig.tar.xz
c58bed1c61aad4beaca1a02a3c8ed7169830b7d8df58e3ca746fd5577c256dd7 2964 libocxl_1.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
fbaed35658048f4a03f314083b677f65 2089 libs optional libocxl_1.2.1-1.dsc
54d9ba3789f99a1da0a84b90403410d8 71096 libs optional libocxl_1.2.1.orig.tar.xz
29468203de27bd83cde08df2850d6a8f 2964 libs optional libocxl_1.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=TRrM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: