[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted rstcheck 3.3.1-1 (source all) into unstable, unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2021 10:21:48 +0200
Source: rstcheck
Binary: rstcheck
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Team <team+python@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org>
Description:
 rstcheck   - Validator for reStructuredText documents with code blocks
Closes: 985365
Changes:
 rstcheck (3.3.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Initial release (Closes: #985365)
Checksums-Sha1:
 f7b83b26a01e05de119b03d8f21cb831322347f0 1859 rstcheck_3.3.1-1.dsc
 abd91a8c2fa9c6f1c6a1dad38674c2740d5bbdbd 16054 rstcheck_3.3.1.orig.tar.gz
 8e47644b2c9870b7321541fd30bd315b2cafd17c 4332 rstcheck_3.3.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 32129fb82de7fcd1aa9d35484cb194e30c5f96d8 16464 rstcheck_3.3.1-1_all.deb
 eb09bef04146989a06dfb6ebc9a1806cb5108eb8 6405 rstcheck_3.3.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 ed66a2d17e505da3f5a7f5cfa154e0c0a821450bad33ff0e3b0d491fa6ad0ff4 1859 rstcheck_3.3.1-1.dsc
 5044a6a043c84a0e9513ff397adfb82af4cecdc9214491c428ccf4e966309c52 16054 rstcheck_3.3.1.orig.tar.gz
 a3b2c9b2c27cc64fd49f4866161d98f5e6869adea3eaf0b32cdcc3f1b263d1e5 4332 rstcheck_3.3.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 24d11b56ce7bef30058e2d7dbb52546adf9b0446c86e0d15b1c210a6607c6c6b 16464 rstcheck_3.3.1-1_all.deb
 25cea63457039879cbd16cef749c7b888ccf41fdbb7afb3151af22332a0dd195 6405 rstcheck_3.3.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 d7f41709a18cecd43eed414b1c2b6c1a 1859 text optional rstcheck_3.3.1-1.dsc
 c0f8be4558e24a9102ffd8e295726e26 16054 text optional rstcheck_3.3.1.orig.tar.gz
 d7248d27f91a5bdb4f685c9aba3a09aa 4332 text optional rstcheck_3.3.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 d20be3ac20f0b3c2027e4f1441d68906 16464 text optional rstcheck_3.3.1-1_all.deb
 bb21bcebc46ee77992226d9214cae62a 6405 text optional rstcheck_3.3.1-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQHIBAEBCgAyFiEEJvtDgpxjkjCIVtam+C8H+466LVkFAmDEbzQUHHJvZWhsaW5n
QGRlYmlhbi5vcmcACgkQ+C8H+466LVk8tAwAmgeuW7Pg6hKpts0Un2DiZzrJaWof
CDuWVDIkRfVP9cOKM4ysryY2l+EL6CHTCQKPreRoshmqubjBbBmbo5jMnyxF/jF5
YjhUzWpwESiVuvuJ+ESzrz9PcrEyxgW5MuucBdMK501pamoRWB3c444vct+YXrzt
qZVBVwFwMjt2JXXuRe7JM3RZEfNVCjmcCWeOkVxT5kd1XvDInQQwuy4K55J3zFsO
8XDcqvcbRWSWqcML8dNQUO5mnsT5aRRB4ZUyjJdQ2qWpOEFRmrZWRIgm5GvlF7Ac
Nts2SSV/MIZE/6m0Ac64KtlpGNPu6LDKYldk4nw5M7K0fYU5xcYmGPVcyY7tnS08
XNM2T1MQ4kwDRzTJ2t1VI4nVhEdpWRRCDti1ualK2UJhLu5IoD5bx8GHMpPvqTI+
K00YX/O0lVnGqG5WFoZkLEcO8pgJHmtbqBHv+X/BEiLcLuNfinP0jG05kdYNHdf3
5uvK4RBRG3NTfKvbpU55DwJgnVl9q49wePC9
=nTLa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: