Accepted racket 8.2+dfsg1-2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 20:48:34 -0300
Source: racket
Architecture: source
Version: 8.2+dfsg1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
Changed-By: David Bremner <bremner@debian.org>
Closes: 935930 986874
Changes:
racket (8.2+dfsg1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Re-upload to unstable.
* Bug fix: "build with -O2 to avoid misbuild with CFLAGS=-O3", thanks to
Steve Langasek (Closes: #935930).
.
racket (8.2+dfsg1-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release
.
racket (8.0+dfsg1-4) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Bug fix: "missing Breaks+Replaces: racket-common (<< 8)", thanks
to Andreas Beckmann (Closes: #986874).
* Drop Breaks/Depends on plt-scheme (package not in oldstable)
* Drop provides of plt-scheme.
.
racket (8.0+dfsg1-3) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Use bc backend for all except amd64, arm64, armhf, i386 (enable some
ports)
.
racket (8.0+dfsg1-2) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Use bc backend on armel, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, and s390x
* Don't pass --noopt to configure by default
.
racket (8.0+dfsg1-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release
* Build with Chez Scheme backend
* update debian/copyright for Chez Scheme bundle
Checksums-Sha1:
05f40a12e5bef514284aebad89b41739237e0408 2323 racket_8.2+dfsg1-2.dsc
d4591a3daf85ab3b1d5b76df688ffe09d874bb92 26536 racket_8.2+dfsg1-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
ae524e45853eae6c7b61fc199433f2b0dc66304c33bb02ecac10bb87ff6231e6 2323 racket_8.2+dfsg1-2.dsc
3fa16a58d5bbfa44825d684b14c2cf56b5d27112243f167d96ff1b5afdf93350 26536 racket_8.2+dfsg1-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
4bead40841e831d6ed1a0ab0666cd60a 2323 lisp optional racket_8.2+dfsg1-2.dsc
e52489b6ebea3cffb55d77257eef5211 26536 lisp optional racket_8.2+dfsg1-2.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=UEnX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: