Accepted mako-notifier 1.6-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 21:28:31 +0200
Source: mako-notifier
Architecture: source
Version: 1.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Sway and related packages team <team+swaywm@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Birger Schacht <birger@debian.org>
Closes: 966335
Changes:
mako-notifier (1.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release
* Switch to git-bare repository layout
* Update uploader email address
* Switch to standards-version 4.5.1 (no changes required)
* Bump debhelper-compat version to 13
* Let the binary package declare that it provides a notification-daemon
(Closes: #966335)
* Add a lintian override for the dbus notification service file
Checksums-Sha1:
f26d20cf7e4ce27984ee811dda6a9f9192ccfc0b 2079 mako-notifier_1.6-1.dsc
4437b55e1dd5575c99a9facda9c040e8ab2753c5 60493 mako-notifier_1.6.orig.tar.gz
3108bd424ca9c0761d957cdd2df64ea5fb9d5f69 2868 mako-notifier_1.6-1.debian.tar.xz
f69cf7272227a09b6c0fa89f9b055ca08fa1cbe9 10292 mako-notifier_1.6-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
66ea33db91030f5a7503270d652da2b92ebd861533a592d4b6ae0b06a54f3946 2079 mako-notifier_1.6-1.dsc
836e7697089fd694fb70def1ecb6e3c21287f21ebbc2e545fd770657e7a5a4e6 60493 mako-notifier_1.6.orig.tar.gz
84653d34ae32209f7b2d57d6aaa7ea2cd967c6aa7dc353d4e8cbe3796bddf17c 2868 mako-notifier_1.6-1.debian.tar.xz
53ec8c7b1a92f97d24c27181b64e25a3616c65438a06d77c480f95c95275ac80 10292 mako-notifier_1.6-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
b04a34faf60384e970a3ea38316be67b 2079 x11 optional mako-notifier_1.6-1.dsc
a273c02595d4d632607086c182315586 60493 x11 optional mako-notifier_1.6.orig.tar.gz
62fb333b38a684f0c3c58004d813484c 2868 x11 optional mako-notifier_1.6-1.debian.tar.xz
57240fe6c37e817221fddc21f547beb2 10292 x11 optional mako-notifier_1.6-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=n++E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: