[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted libblockdev 2.26-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2021 12:48:49 +0200
Source: libblockdev
Architecture: source
Version: 2.26-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Utopia Maintenance Team <pkg-utopia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org>
Closes: 987899
Changes:
 libblockdev (2.26-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload
   * New upstream release
   * Drop thin-provisioning-tools dependency from libblockdev-lvm2.
     It is no longer needed as the thin_metadata_size tool isn't used
     anymore. (Closes: #987899)
   * Drop patches, applied upstream
Checksums-Sha1:
 85e8ffcfc0d0ebf84669c111a18558fadb3f7b1a 5075 libblockdev_2.26-1.dsc
 bd9d9bbf783d4e1e37b3963e96807d1a438ca6e8 399120 libblockdev_2.26.orig.tar.gz
 5b7f88e4ef74d4df42269e51710b8ee6cc7f974c 10848 libblockdev_2.26-1.debian.tar.xz
 2e773d01f99a654a9bfb210c3cfa7ba651b3d004 7773 libblockdev_2.26-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 0f3e822e13d9ee18fb9f6a891719cc690e53060f6cf7ade32a943cf584d79bc5 5075 libblockdev_2.26-1.dsc
 a27ccc3798013287b148d38dbac82a4207e4e845679501c0e000aab170414236 399120 libblockdev_2.26.orig.tar.gz
 0d0467f85e14e53cb937837dd8582d23c988cde5a780d30fc2eb05e272ed9724 10848 libblockdev_2.26-1.debian.tar.xz
 16c4da98845dd4dcaf75773248c9245e7fa634353d8de2f42daaa6b6f94fcea8 7773 libblockdev_2.26-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 de44d872f6a19190f81de42b02dd8815 5075 libs optional libblockdev_2.26-1.dsc
 49db51728839942ce6b08ae19db063ca 399120 libs optional libblockdev_2.26.orig.tar.gz
 582e73edca90529f65a2ba2757c28233 10848 libs optional libblockdev_2.26-1.debian.tar.xz
 a9e4f2103f88a4fbbb83b9227ec358c2 7773 libs optional libblockdev_2.26-1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=f6wu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: