Accepted linux-signed-arm64 5.10.46+3 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 07:55:40 +0200
Source: linux-signed-arm64
Architecture: source
Version: 5.10.46+3
Distribution: sid
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
Changes:
linux-signed-arm64 (5.10.46+3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Sign kernel from linux 5.10.46-3
.
* [armhf] Add mdio-aspeed to nic-modules.
Thanks to Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au> (Closes: #991262)
* Revert "drm/amdgpu/gfx9: fix the doorbell missing when in CGPG issue."
(Closes: #990312)
* Revert "drm/amdgpu/gfx10: enlarge CP_MEC_DOORBELL_RANGE_UPPER to cover full
doorbell." (Closes: #990312)
* Input: joydev - prevent use of not validated data in JSIOCSBTNMAP ioctl
(CVE-2021-3612)
* sctp: validate from_addr_param return (CVE-2021-3655)
* sctp: add size validation when walking chunks (CVE-2021-3655)
* [s390x] sclp_vt220: fix console name to match device (Closes: #961056)
* block: return the correct bvec when checking for gaps
* sctp: fix return value check in __sctp_rcv_asconf_lookup
Checksums-Sha1:
e7292673f6ad72247c74481d8dcc9faf77ac757a 7240 linux-signed-arm64_5.10.46+3.dsc
e2b4c9ef35f0ac22b81df35d37d01f71e4231b1a 2411632 linux-signed-arm64_5.10.46+3.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
b3239318426954f85ff4770c657033f77e525456d3d50f49015a7c5320cccd45 7240 linux-signed-arm64_5.10.46+3.dsc
12381c6a7e84331920dbb1855d6bf17e3529c621927fb6558e66791cb1bfc34c 2411632 linux-signed-arm64_5.10.46+3.tar.xz
Files:
31f0fbf83872385afbfc0e9191ea239b 7240 kernel optional linux-signed-arm64_5.10.46+3.dsc
db940f6d232a94f0000c98c93ba1aa0d 2411632 kernel optional linux-signed-arm64_5.10.46+3.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=2Hm+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: