[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted opendmarc 1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-4 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 29 May 2021 16:22:50 +0200
Source: opendmarc
Architecture: source
Version: 1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
Changed-By: David Bürgin <dbuergin@gluet.ch>
Closes: 977766 977767
Changes:
 opendmarc (1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Backport patches from upstream version 1.4.1.1 (Closes: #977766, #977767):
     - CVE-2019-16378: Fix handling of multi-valued From headers
     - CVE-2019-20790: Validate incoming SPF headers
     - CVE-2020-12272: Check DKIM and SPF domain syntax
Checksums-Sha1:
 32de1e8bb97fc69784105bd92fe264aa13ae6bec 2178 opendmarc_1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-4.dsc
 eec19f3b5380016772f5cc27076a25d7c6036334 30720 opendmarc_1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-4.debian.tar.xz
 b2ec36602f3fd031f376147fafb51d653a6d401e 5832 opendmarc_1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 6541a9f1702ec8045bf0c7b7f46073910ace4c108f12d75b49a7c5be42cf28e6 2178 opendmarc_1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-4.dsc
 485d0132036b438835eb15579672804e7202c6b05eca40170481ba6ab0efb9d0 30720 opendmarc_1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-4.debian.tar.xz
 ea7dae1816d810c72f1177b8b9c2779e83639338514dffc041d94961e9232429 5832 opendmarc_1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
 1b29ee6f3541e65b45973d764a4a5717 2178 mail optional opendmarc_1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-4.dsc
 bf9abc10181862af0b2c201215cdf1ea 30720 mail optional opendmarc_1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-4.debian.tar.xz
 a3841c40fbdbbe356ba8693dc8cc9e70 5832 mail optional opendmarc_1.4.0~beta1+dfsg-4_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ppZo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: