[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted openjdk-11 11.0.11+7-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 09:49:54 +0100
Source: openjdk-11
Architecture: source
Version: 11.0.11+7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: OpenJDK Team <openjdk-11@packages.debian.org>
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>
Changes:
 openjdk-11 (11.0.11+7-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * OpenJDK 11.0.11+7 build (early access).
   * Simplify compiler selection for backports.
   * Don't use the triplet-prefixed binutils tools for backports.
Checksums-Sha1:
 75ac36777cc93649ed31aa2aa4f1ed1a9d815186 4527 openjdk-11_11.0.11+7-1.dsc
 a52d5f8506bff3a0703765ba576495f387e7d8e4 78067152 openjdk-11_11.0.11+7.orig.tar.xz
 35410f7732687ef8dd95c2d3f69cf2c58c5674f3 164992 openjdk-11_11.0.11+7-1.debian.tar.xz
 7c4b90b94e9cca3f177af49f9bb47571b2f5f12c 6550 openjdk-11_11.0.11+7-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 807aee12dc513c50365499513633b7e10a0cb7a953dda1f4253c416c686bf142 4527 openjdk-11_11.0.11+7-1.dsc
 4dbe568b4168d575e66fd0ab05c0e9c4ff4b31fcd5d26a21d728cb9015f10686 78067152 openjdk-11_11.0.11+7.orig.tar.xz
 04c5ca111357b8c311b0ecc2b61dcc157549ad4cbf75e02be78ab31c61810725 164992 openjdk-11_11.0.11+7-1.debian.tar.xz
 0dd67b871e0f5cbea396f84b26249f7f05a2bc13338e2619b1c6f78df176b4f3 6550 openjdk-11_11.0.11+7-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 81f87466e235d45fc35f1a3ded74dcb1 4527 java optional openjdk-11_11.0.11+7-1.dsc
 2e9692b08d1e799cf261ad0b79c1573c 78067152 java optional openjdk-11_11.0.11+7.orig.tar.xz
 e26cd72d816c1002ae8b3cfb41517e66 164992 java optional openjdk-11_11.0.11+7-1.debian.tar.xz
 a1556b48b109e8fe32b2e5ec926b3722 6550 java optional openjdk-11_11.0.11+7-1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=daIF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: