[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted litecli 1.6.0-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 20:22:58 +0100
Source: litecli
Architecture: source
Version: 1.6.0-1
Distribution: sid
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Changes:
 litecli (1.6.0-1) sid; urgency=medium
 .
   * Uploading to sid.
   * Merging upstream version 1.6.0.
   * Updating python debhelper sequence.
Checksums-Sha1:
 99a31fd776b9044a82337d77b462b5c92266b20a 1968 litecli_1.6.0-1.dsc
 363e9d2eee5ecce7b3c90514c29fcdb8ab74bf01 858028 litecli_1.6.0.orig.tar.xz
 9f727f437d453bc02371e5f7f38ef3b604f21b34 2216 litecli_1.6.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 bd9ebf3e7e457dd2190c4b7d25ec519fc7793a82 6314 litecli_1.6.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 046e7a127e23606daa08207e8f7a57c5c4f6466ab07e5cbdcc13d901bb01a6da 1968 litecli_1.6.0-1.dsc
 9936bbd693d25b8a305af64861f4d560eb7f7b6dcb832d489605f6b1884d6cf3 858028 litecli_1.6.0.orig.tar.xz
 1325c8e243906746d562925fb00ff6a2b2997d2dc57f80f3f968a1e1fe22c69b 2216 litecli_1.6.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 906db12154d6ea261c0fafeda259c11a437db269590be0ec2dadb6bf76d1354e 6314 litecli_1.6.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 f50d33d64a0aea53c15bb6d4f2480a7c 1968 database optional litecli_1.6.0-1.dsc
 75ab87041d0a684b3293afebc55ecf06 858028 database optional litecli_1.6.0.orig.tar.xz
 da5c821e1abe0debbd36cc91bb49de42 2216 database optional litecli_1.6.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 cf72676cb96dc2a58616dda40855bbc8 6314 database optional litecli_1.6.0-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=rVF+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: