Accepted nextepc 0.3.10+nods-4 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 23:35:09 +0100
Source: nextepc
Architecture: source
Version: 0.3.10+nods-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Mobcom Maintainers <Debian-mobcom-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ruben Undheim <ruben.undheim@gmail.com>
Closes: 954512
Changes:
nextepc (0.3.10+nods-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* d/patches/0007-Patch-deprecated-sys-sysctl.h-problem.patch
- Fix FTBFS with GCC 10 (Closes: #954512)
* Standards-Version: 4.5.1
* debhelper-compat 13
* d/rules: Disable tests for now
* Add salsa-ci file
* d/control:
- Rules-Requires-Root: no
- Use secure URI in Homepage field.
* d/watch: Update watch file format version to 4.
* Remove obsolete field Name from debian/upstream/metadata (already present in
machine-readable debian/copyright).
Checksums-Sha1:
9d1b1fb4a5febcac1781fba76f53940998b9515c 2528 nextepc_0.3.10+nods-4.dsc
efdc6dae37c0a1f461265bee91db37c9e5561fc7 19872 nextepc_0.3.10+nods-4.debian.tar.xz
d57d736a6eeadee05412929168560f6972770357 6974 nextepc_0.3.10+nods-4_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
86b524576a3142ff7d3713ebdc48243b4c800ab36119cae564f4def2e74ef663 2528 nextepc_0.3.10+nods-4.dsc
0c87374ed3344656f851f17e143148fb26cd7f42dd600c64e6d08b7e3081f8af 19872 nextepc_0.3.10+nods-4.debian.tar.xz
44b56bf907aaf2be24f90522d707575b7465dc41eb2f0962184c865ec48c7da8 6974 nextepc_0.3.10+nods-4_source.buildinfo
Files:
6af77af24b9573f12e4073709fcfb702 2528 net optional nextepc_0.3.10+nods-4.dsc
bf5b9563989601433258a43f9693edf0 19872 net optional nextepc_0.3.10+nods-4.debian.tar.xz
f06a94f69ec1da2f287d25854d9db7bc 6974 net optional nextepc_0.3.10+nods-4_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=2+CS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: