Accepted libcoy-perl 0.06-9 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 03:50:17 +0100
Source: libcoy-perl
Architecture: source
Version: 0.06-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Perl Group <pkg-perl-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>
Changes:
libcoy-perl (0.06-9) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Damyan Ivanov ]
* declare conformance with Policy 4.1.3 (no changes needed)
.
[ Salvatore Bonaccorso ]
* Update Vcs-* headers for switch to salsa.debian.org
.
[ Laurent Baillet ]
* fix lintian file-contains-trailing-whitespace warning
.
[ Debian Janitor ]
* Bump debhelper from old 10 to 12.
* Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
.
[ gregor herrmann ]
* debian/watch: use uscan version 4.
.
[ Axel Beckert ]
* Create debian/tests/pkg-perl/use-name as per lintian warning.
* Declare debian/patches/hashbang.patch as debian-specific.
* Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.5.1.
* Bump debhelper-compat to 13.
Checksums-Sha1:
be784f959fdedc9537e8c7b31001e8e765aacbfa 2012 libcoy-perl_0.06-9.dsc
f3751c1ada55e6fcb4e1f1236162292110a9bde8 4164 libcoy-perl_0.06-9.debian.tar.xz
c8c543b6d2ed645b060b8549a265c3504c82420a 6231 libcoy-perl_0.06-9_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
702ad1454e8e6ccc8d9400e4247cf6eb9bbcac6e0071fded76940717604f6e5b 2012 libcoy-perl_0.06-9.dsc
6fd5bdf9c8e2f1eb1a2750e62faa900ed512773b32053315c2b78dca21fa5349 4164 libcoy-perl_0.06-9.debian.tar.xz
8de7ac3363d49344ca980f6e8efd55ca3351ff628d5b0654d39c6f42fb2d231b 6231 libcoy-perl_0.06-9_source.buildinfo
Files:
0995d2c77bada75b507842f30eeb4205 2012 perl optional libcoy-perl_0.06-9.dsc
094ce8f539ef5c11b33b59b157981997 4164 perl optional libcoy-perl_0.06-9.debian.tar.xz
979311206407186677efca201bfa454d 6231 perl optional libcoy-perl_0.06-9_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=jWR+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: