[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted usbguard 1.0.0+ds-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:32:22 +0100
Source: usbguard
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.0+ds-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Birger Schacht <birger@debian.org>
Changed-By: Birger Schacht <birger@debian.org>
Closes: 980073
Changes:
 usbguard (1.0.0+ds-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release (Closes: #980073)
   * d/control: Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.1 (no changes required)
   * d/watch: Bump watchfile version to 4
   * d/patches: update patches and add patch to use /run instead of /var/run in
     the usbguard systemd service file
Checksums-Sha1:
 fe7129a743c3a2c1f0f9bcf1445d2ca01174aa9f 2335 usbguard_1.0.0+ds-1.dsc
 e5bc2a1ee1cc70ac50b196edf562e6b511ea257c 476820 usbguard_1.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz
 24d0dbb4d5fe2f8cb9910b43f8c55cb72c4551f6 15712 usbguard_1.0.0+ds-1.debian.tar.xz
 736b821fe50d9ee951ea4995c03a69587d0b23f2 9783 usbguard_1.0.0+ds-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 40ed8ef2f1ab7d97b08e742a97fed314ad458ad3ba53c090a8954c471aa4d545 2335 usbguard_1.0.0+ds-1.dsc
 46d929dac3054b17611bff8eb16cee22c4a84d70aa7e024d94749d542b206e84 476820 usbguard_1.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz
 a5a8c57919a3e6880292e59647a645b00c1c6f2e0647695e69f20deb9fd36d61 15712 usbguard_1.0.0+ds-1.debian.tar.xz
 e1ab0a83f4acd66bd2e1142ee5282c222f2123aa1c1bee44bff74ccab5464654 9783 usbguard_1.0.0+ds-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 d3654d1a4d6ad8a6bbf311af8c6265b4 2335 utils optional usbguard_1.0.0+ds-1.dsc
 fd0e04e461c9723258294f57edcb7e22 476820 utils optional usbguard_1.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz
 2bd4a0ab1179babbb1e95a67537a91f1 15712 utils optional usbguard_1.0.0+ds-1.debian.tar.xz
 5ca39388bbbf11090247983393d39222 9783 utils optional usbguard_1.0.0+ds-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQJGBAEBCgAwFiEEOvC8tnwmrEjOtOW8KgxdYPIEvbAFAmAFqu0SHGJpcmdlckBk
ZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJECoMXWDyBL2wII0P/0YRGhcDKdiUNHwJ/YBLGmFy3EnriYQp
jidP1uDypUvqGDZjKQah3I9/XDj7gLfkoJLWRzLry4+1jLHzzu/nVnfP8OpoBvm0
v/oan1eISNo+qagFncVHYLz7ULktWy2oyGXdEBIaLCkcVwEFnNcx35qXUQq55QYO
eLSBClCIyLMdFly/Uf3NkfvgOvH8w+RhqJtpkcuAZD3PoBI/FBG+DlskB1CQXHf7
wiyTN1FegBBjDar7LR7t9Wdut0/r11dGvrfLPPOHXEGqSz+KCeXXCmqBiedMCp5O
4xqcn5PfqLJd/TRQohQkR8M8op3s/NHcxzxNHtIbSTqfjb6WSaV46JbhGN3elLdh
YNoWUiMdso9iTlEeV6naZEP0F6VgG13vBwObqHiaAOOI6Icnacdnfm/llmLxICFD
SaYqmMfLrMVvZNJAfmzSfPI+62H1MBGi/YTdrEOv1Mg/e/pZMoF7crGHDCDEpVu8
JUAOvtDvJZpznHPdOT8DM5M7Cy1WcBj7kIIebWX/0iACQXeL+KvO4e7SAa2HxiIT
rpHavikqrRVdDqI5X4LQcPtIPZC32sO2c0NmNTKmicBidyHE3L65a+UqmLHV87Sf
8I16b5JHtVxSsJA1u3GWyifRaSKmMHvVo4m010BUtU1acomh3puT4bw+1NOYUbpD
m1h/U4Wdj+g9
=9mIZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: