Accepted node-stealthy-require 1.1.1-4 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:02:28 +0100
Source: node-stealthy-require
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Javascript Maintainers <pkg-javascript-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Xavier Guimard <yadd@debian.org>
Changes:
node-stealthy-require (1.1.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Team upload
.
[ Debian Janitor ]
* Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
* Set upstream metadata fields: Bug-Submit.
* Remove obsolete fields Contact, Name from debian/upstream/metadata (already
present in machine-readable debian/copyright).
* Update standards version to 4.5.0, no changes needed.
* Apply multi-arch hints. + node-stealthy-require: Add Multi-Arch: foreign.
.
[ Xavier Guimard ]
* Bump debhelper compatibility level to 13
* Add "Rules-Requires-Root: no"
* Use dh-sequence-nodejs
* Declare compliance with policy 4.5.1
* Modernize debian/watch
* Replace node-request by node-got in autopkgtest
Checksums-Sha1:
35cb8ec9816589fab9c328aa69ee40802536253c 2209 node-stealthy-require_1.1.1-4.dsc
32f2f9ddfdcdff97fdbb95289914ffbbdb850d61 3136 node-stealthy-require_1.1.1-4.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
47eb087f7bf4718b3670d66ee3f8dc2eda8b28b92a42d32f98022de9e3958ddc 2209 node-stealthy-require_1.1.1-4.dsc
045149afd78461e090bc16fa1774e645c5cf977cdb9b80784befddd7c5ce2e94 3136 node-stealthy-require_1.1.1-4.debian.tar.xz
Files:
5ecef78cc2cb5ef37c5e3ecea6d33ad4 2209 javascript optional node-stealthy-require_1.1.1-4.dsc
b7e4f18d1a310e0e1c05b76189e34d28 3136 javascript optional node-stealthy-require_1.1.1-4.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEAN/li4tVV3nRAF7J9tdMp8mZ7ukFAmAFTuAACgkQ9tdMp8mZ
7uk8fg/8CdO0VosDQyRsC73uc5IagRjpwn+it8b3IOH34w9RNFaXHMJhI7YzpRhy
0ZMxXYKKb16NQQtgMFhZtMxJnw79Od3szg5jU1Jf/2DVp0fv8/yeUfdAAINQHqt5
UHCLtjLnItNfPm3khBb6C0flG/zcwphZM4/dQq0BA7XjPsCpzRUJgpjcOZQ1c9pW
0RApMQ2jkWc/jb4gVOP0W9WTNch/dHNmflTkrSgqd+MzxFOgttxW3YbBGhaf+SmR
2lGJxYYd4zuMeYyHj+jEY2NO8zQm0bz/ENaZlr81L54ZVfdd3eFiu7JN8TfsgLlq
2rUmz4KLbFKfznf9QG9K5BvfY+wQ/vGrJGm67PrGPLnAwA1Xo1ekrbz6N4HWv0Py
Jz6TOx5KxYGrUfgcRk0wLEza9POJlc9ZnfDAOJ2XPF9XcLyeObUpPJ3mQxTpGzY+
7D4sUVNptpm6new8DBQOZt5XfIPYarF60ySrNc2co/+xqMCJLhOQ9qLzDhzVNudQ
cK9YgEcsr6BeVnCiQUk18ijD7I0uRTWJuDrffDOUSOV82KIzzr3m3pF1NmtY4sxV
QwNy6Q5j0YPaTibADZUk8WnK02BlLtXOYQ3R2FAnxPDcKDcIUVcFZxU/swphwOLU
EwnNhvZ8tViMCLMevrH1wwW0YIJCYLj6wMJtLtFuRCKjgnBm/nM=
=pZA/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: