[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted r-cran-afex 0.28-1-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 08:49:17 +0100
Source: r-cran-afex
Architecture: source
Version: 0.28-1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian R Packages Maintainers <r-pkg-team@alioth-lists.debian.net>
Changed-By: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
Changes:
 r-cran-afex (0.28-1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * New upstream version
   * Standards-Version: 4.5.1 (routine-update)
   * Ignore tests requiring MEMSS as long as r-cran-memss is not available
   * Test-Depends: r-cran-psychtools
Checksums-Sha1:
 b1ef67e81db11201a41d61d92cc8540c57dfe7e7 2246 r-cran-afex_0.28-1-1.dsc
 ca4bc50a6eb486125085962f0468cb7edbf424c0 3944529 r-cran-afex_0.28-1.orig.tar.gz
 ef4dcd192bd70914bae1c8c3e775f115ccb99f1a 5256 r-cran-afex_0.28-1-1.debian.tar.xz
 df9705c049c8645dd3567687607da0e35b430e48 13844 r-cran-afex_0.28-1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 e30f6d59ceb5c436881a57a978664773242caa8af3eb0f6493f9e305cc53143e 2246 r-cran-afex_0.28-1-1.dsc
 cfb0b79bfa01b590afc3354a5b2ad3640d2f4974b036d6c256fa8e684bc69c2e 3944529 r-cran-afex_0.28-1.orig.tar.gz
 5e1c464559a0081e5ccc89925e7308d1193eb03c6d949d2d87667b3a7e04cbe6 5256 r-cran-afex_0.28-1-1.debian.tar.xz
 7b62f4231904d61d5931eadf268e621e481096c39de4cf209499607c2ff667b7 13844 r-cran-afex_0.28-1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 33ad8714c0c10432e471dad451ea698a 2246 gnu-r optional r-cran-afex_0.28-1-1.dsc
 3173b25b22e7e99b40ea41824160f951 3944529 gnu-r optional r-cran-afex_0.28-1.orig.tar.gz
 08aff4740fc59b3d758693304e3db1f9 5256 gnu-r optional r-cran-afex_0.28-1-1.debian.tar.xz
 c984cdb0d97d262881abb12ae0e706e9 13844 gnu-r optional r-cran-afex_0.28-1-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=RkMu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: