Accepted android-sdk-meta 28.0.2+1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 10:28:12 +0530
Source: android-sdk-meta
Architecture: source
Version: 28.0.2+1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Android Tools Maintainers <android-tools-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Samyak Jain <samyak.jn11@gmail.com>
Closes: 941260
Changes:
android-sdk-meta (28.0.2+1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Team Upload
.
[ Debian Janitor ]
* Use correct machine-readable copyright file URI.
* Bump debhelper from old 10 to 12.
* Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
* Update standards version to 4.4.1, no changes needed.
* Update standards version to 4.5.0, no changes needed.
.
[ Hans-Christoph Steiner ]
* support all valid package revisions in the meta package versions
* create source.properties in proper Java Properties format
* include new udev rules from upstream source
* add autopkgtest for current Google-recommended install method
.
[ Samyak Jain ]
* Adds Huawei P10 Lite to udev rules (Closes: #941260)
* Rules-Requires-Root: no
Checksums-Sha1:
ff725c7592b4af3c15342475e12696bbaddcb70b 2040 android-sdk-meta_28.0.2+1.dsc
b470b8204aedbb80520b03fd515b17c5a69e8dc7 11276 android-sdk-meta_28.0.2+1.tar.xz
3f8d80900dbde107bb687804e090298e4e7497e7 5607 android-sdk-meta_28.0.2+1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
44b66353d42afc9d7778f119df6296934bf338f6d0f863bc78c9af4952486060 2040 android-sdk-meta_28.0.2+1.dsc
cbef0095a0af6b774c0685531e6ffc221e434b2aa6399ae2a8000f16cc2af0a1 11276 android-sdk-meta_28.0.2+1.tar.xz
d392c336a4a94fa164204076a132e531a70c815fb2bce729781a14b67953b1ce 5607 android-sdk-meta_28.0.2+1_source.buildinfo
Files:
3e1e493940027b7a595c7ce3ff54d30f 2040 metapackages optional android-sdk-meta_28.0.2+1.dsc
d18178b788b4fafcc1e3b73713d493c2 11276 metapackages optional android-sdk-meta_28.0.2+1.tar.xz
3176c9b062f8033f31db4a769469b1a8 5607 metapackages optional android-sdk-meta_28.0.2+1_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEElyI52+aGmfUmwGoFPhd4F7obm/oFAmADYIoACgkQPhd4F7ob
m/p3vQgArBLclJQpvOneM+q5PETNY9MWksJEgkzyKIUf5Dc1oJZKFuNLv0mMm1wf
0ZkIJUuf6DePM4EUUdKOw6LylTPt+Tge5g4HyxcU3B8Arbj75d+rNgJdDEgXxnZ3
pnYoLGroNuXUDpi2XvQ0wySr2nrskLvjmw9DRu9Aw2/Tq/6ZGhP0gjwfnsrSQCTl
O//EjhhtyC4GPIV6bystAETu1Qk88YfqumCr+Cn0nA1jFC07iu1Z5PFrCivNAF4w
Lu/5LYKvrIgKQ15TMCHOO/0hTFbYeSqFETzeF3xJPduSjz8yoYWoTOQLp4JaaxfA
jqTEvSggUUbjD3E1rqVbWHfzZMRRHA==
=FWoI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: