[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted jemalloc 5.2.1-2 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 01:36:20 +0200
Source: jemalloc
Architecture: source
Version: 5.2.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org>
Changed-By: Faidon Liambotis <paravoid@debian.org>
Closes: 828871 955557
Changes:
 jemalloc (5.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Make autopkgtests cross-test-friendly. (Closes: #955557)
   * Replace deprecated variable ADTTMP with AUTOPKGTEST_TMP in autopkgtests.
   * Try to reenable support for Hurd. (Closes: #828871)
   * Add Rules-Requires-Root: no, to allow building the package without root.
   * Add support for the "nodoc" build profile.
   * General package hygiene:
     - Bump debhelper compatibility level to 13.
     - Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.1, no changes needed.
     - Bump watch to version 4.
     - Add upstream metadata.
Checksums-Sha1:
 49a3f1c40a01e4bae9d0c30f2452fa58ce0181cd 1955 jemalloc_5.2.1-2.dsc
 a1e6cd59bb119241f328e1f21b24e62973c61da9 14004 jemalloc_5.2.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 f323c22c8264ff057806b97c9cd6379ec0c061ef 5872 jemalloc_5.2.1-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 829843f19b37336c99e5368814efb82d9b7530f759c1014f07d8e4e07d583a77 1955 jemalloc_5.2.1-2.dsc
 228c7f54ec716bff727e47f45fc34b744c237f9a71df81c8e430d798726870b7 14004 jemalloc_5.2.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 735846a6df80f1ca6fa5231ef502113e7ef447a56329df52dc80c9bb7ebc81c6 5872 jemalloc_5.2.1-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 58d9342acad5793a65d5c38edec37181 1955 libs optional jemalloc_5.2.1-2.dsc
 ab8a6f1a98dcef5c6f8dc6620e744e4f 14004 libs optional jemalloc_5.2.1-2.debian.tar.xz
 fb9c11eb52423020e7ebb877e082243f 5872 libs optional jemalloc_5.2.1-2_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEqVksUhy5BAd9ZZgAnQteWx7sjw4FAl/6RtIACgkQnQteWx7s
jw4s0g//Yia8qG8isCvIsKqD6QHUBMMjr54kb0FlKaJUW9AjzLeUBTKSoQXL5UEV
OBvw7rAvCLO5RXWfFUsGhPbmaj1b77XBlcp91THwSHZOjRBcVpIifsH3TPLAW96I
xdu8WuA7iqHtY38fwTGxW15v9ZsXlGMkxQN/JO7Yke2zeIMlNITbf58viFSKyD+A
yeiO+o1SXA+ghvFnzZmzVX53JlvbBhu0hPNjVhQtV90nrSYkjOcC70nyNkseT8rt
gA7SwnYCy54i7QTRc2JilaLdn7trQHgb30lT7nC69NRXrr4e7xINcZG64IWS4NpV
Tcz5WeLBMgY2ybqVBof9+i3oRXkp0w3JF9wbOSlzyEOQW+YfEz2RDWvNCvhdJKCx
7Kv8gtusLMyPTqcgKX0BQ6O3Ov/M1jO3ZxcpsOLEJyGccSYYkLcbuTZUo+HNKkhP
2D4/N4ide3K9W8LfoRrkIuvXmo669ihv/EKD/8BCWUFRvNflmEoCY3xsIfCwi3Kr
8HJnSEXh5HixcIF4VQiCMGc8+Zb8U9xwyfNd25YclqYTP+nZSHP2lVVJigNpQBIz
jpCLddHxa0H5ep7hL1t5tmdRF9Ya9F/HO1j5+W8gFujLCcBa7QcFh8rurZdCQZsE
OXrJJh9uD2Nt+Di3r/CvokstSNQYRQUH9HeuizgR5fvKBdjoMP4=
=SyKf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: