Accepted bosixnet 2.0-2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 00:53:45 +0300
Source: bosixnet
Architecture: source
Version: 2.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Boris Pek <tehnick@debian.org>
Changed-By: Boris Pek <tehnick@debian.org>
Changes:
bosixnet (2.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Update debian/control:
- bump Standards-Version to 4.5.1 (was 4.2.1): no changes required
- replace build dependency from debhelper (>= 11~) to
debhelper-compat (= 13)
- add Rules-Requires-Root: no
* Delete debian/compat
* Update debian/watch
* Simplify debian/rules:
remove DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND variable with -Wl,--as-needed flag
* Add debian/bosixnet-webui.lintian-overrides
* Add debian/bosixnet-daemon.lintian-overrides
Checksums-Sha1:
66c5588c6b57e703aa6282acc80eb7ea359cae9d 1930 bosixnet_2.0-2.dsc
e6a0d4c8886dd84a9d188e6f46280fae8b54f801 13226 bosixnet_2.0.orig.tar.gz
7824cfe4dc208d7664072e624fe905d00488a195 3736 bosixnet_2.0-2.debian.tar.xz
791ca5766b5ce2bdbf79cd04bfc323cb49537473 7134 bosixnet_2.0-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
0d8b1454234759219d6621d05fe2172b0b927f8a335a9af7a3a665ce75edc4c0 1930 bosixnet_2.0-2.dsc
90b2bcbc6d746faf7274d8d4d52b988d44b92af7fb0b8f0063abe0c16ae77686 13226 bosixnet_2.0.orig.tar.gz
6941745be11f48d709049f69e2c0cae76a46adcadf5def9b4dc875185480a707 3736 bosixnet_2.0-2.debian.tar.xz
bd6fddf7595a188f07c2adc9796127263dbaa5173cb2758df32ada69c0ae11de 7134 bosixnet_2.0-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
bb57b9e358aae36e3d2267c288e7593e 1930 net optional bosixnet_2.0-2.dsc
a67db763de22bdfde223d864ad06cd54 13226 net optional bosixnet_2.0.orig.tar.gz
7b78ce7b351d805603def7ea107c8570 3736 net optional bosixnet_2.0-2.debian.tar.xz
47e8be71fe480bfe4d3d2b9a9c8852b9 7134 net optional bosixnet_2.0-2_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=bd26
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: