[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted yubikey-luks 0.5.1+29.g5df2b95-4 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 13:21:45 +0100
Source: yubikey-luks
Architecture: source
Version: 0.5.1+29.g5df2b95-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Yubikey-LUKS Maintainers <yubikey-luks@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Markus Frosch <lazyfrosch@debian.org>
Changes:
 yubikey-luks (0.5.1+29.g5df2b95-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Markus Frosch ]
   * [6fd9f9d] Switch to salsa-ci config
 .
   [ Debian Janitor ]
   * [bb3a508] Bump debhelper from old 11 to 12.
   * [5a74026] Set debhelper-compat version in Build-Depends.
   * [0fb85b0] Set upstream metadata fields: Bug-Database, Bug-Submit.
 .
   [ Markus Frosch ]
   * [93a1024] Bump Standards Version to 4.5.1 and debhelper to 13
Checksums-Sha1:
 8b36ca8490728ed633bd4bb01116d1886a1d053b 2095 yubikey-luks_0.5.1+29.g5df2b95-4.dsc
 f113fe83852bd81d23e07da9f2332d958c4ad9b9 4356 yubikey-luks_0.5.1+29.g5df2b95-4.debian.tar.xz
 073f7d758a7e7c42ec66d71f3b87a2c56e6ccc5f 5766 yubikey-luks_0.5.1+29.g5df2b95-4_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 31fad788c8215cb206a8d2b4306a51d777f89f68226271f0242fdb45f0b4d0a4 2095 yubikey-luks_0.5.1+29.g5df2b95-4.dsc
 2b84716b4cb3a5fdeed56579adf64e48c156143f2b62038d5727e4441a027cbe 4356 yubikey-luks_0.5.1+29.g5df2b95-4.debian.tar.xz
 c3bb9088b37fc298b3f4752325a373098880c07e3e3fc7ceddcf9b88898648e2 5766 yubikey-luks_0.5.1+29.g5df2b95-4_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 3265bbe167586d557d9342e2ae63d06a 2095 admin optional yubikey-luks_0.5.1+29.g5df2b95-4.dsc
 dce6a50e7fa49e7db38170cd3285dd67 4356 admin optional yubikey-luks_0.5.1+29.g5df2b95-4.debian.tar.xz
 9b62aa9146f16b103d42d9b05c1afc7c 5766 admin optional yubikey-luks_0.5.1+29.g5df2b95-4_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=wTXj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: