Accepted rsymphony 0.1-29-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 18:07:49 -0600
Source: rsymphony
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1-29-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Changed-By: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Changes:
rsymphony (0.1-29-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release
.
* debian/control: Set Build-Depends: to current R version
* debian/control: Set Standards-Version: to current version
* debian/control: Add Vcs-Browser: and Vcs-Git:
* debian/control: Switch to virtual debhelper-compat (= 11)
* debian/compat: Removed
* debian/control: Switch from cdbs to dh-r
* debian/rules: Idem
Checksums-Sha1:
db5122302b90e021d82370bbede4441f69324b3b 1899 rsymphony_0.1-29-1.dsc
1c6f46bc241ab2d30d55de3ee6cef719a4f29092 8723 rsymphony_0.1-29.orig.tar.gz
16a5838e5f17a3b97d7f94f1ecf5d5e0f7031aaa 6716 rsymphony_0.1-29-1.debian.tar.xz
8621b7165b25852f3085103c6549d2ad946a50c1 10741 rsymphony_0.1-29-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
be620f8dbeb8478efbd943b28511c9d8efb4cc86ac6977fa5585b49d5ea9a8ba 1899 rsymphony_0.1-29-1.dsc
cbe954aaffef23228595039e1eca6d4c2300ba6ee920a80eaaf2c15b02fa3426 8723 rsymphony_0.1-29.orig.tar.gz
e72beb228885cdca9fe980504900ddb36ace6393c09aff842fd1aaf5815ef3a4 6716 rsymphony_0.1-29-1.debian.tar.xz
1120d7a7654b1a0b3eaa79d4b26bcf09c6a10c0ff49ac57604f29da86678dbb0 10741 rsymphony_0.1-29-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
5e3c80a4f99cb0d67d4aa86ea9894d0c 1899 gnu-r optional rsymphony_0.1-29-1.dsc
7c998ab8db88fe6087b439ebb2a98421 8723 gnu-r optional rsymphony_0.1-29.orig.tar.gz
d2a0591bee7fdd4ec506485bebef2a73 6716 gnu-r optional rsymphony_0.1-29-1.debian.tar.xz
e1933d07598040f6a84de7bf2178b8c6 10741 gnu-r optional rsymphony_0.1-29-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=5FVy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: