Accepted procenv 0.51-0.1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 19:21:52 +0100
Source: procenv
Architecture: source
Version: 0.51-0.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: James Hunt <jamesodhunt@ubuntu.com>
Changed-By: Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofborg@debian.org>
Closes: 952527 952528 966883
Changes:
procenv (0.51-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload
* New upstream release (Closes: #952527)
* Add patch from Ubuntu to fix a gcc-10 build failure (Closes: #966883)
* Drop gcc-9 patch: upstream
* Add patch from Ubuntu to stop mv README in debian/rules, that breaks building twice (it's a symlink
already) (Closes: #952528)
Checksums-Sha1:
7f3d71b06763fb0ca47cdbae16c8c22a39424653 2062 procenv_0.51-0.1.dsc
7708454ba7c1f94c55147a3177cf31a13ffb15eb 245663 procenv_0.51.orig.tar.gz
bbce504deb602cf9b8519d13598a95e7feaf1a2b 71156 procenv_0.51-0.1.debian.tar.xz
634e3dac835e0c82185e9c4d51093445928398e2 7079 procenv_0.51-0.1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
aeafd51852f53109b693c35cc00656f23327e0936146366751c207743ea349ce 2062 procenv_0.51-0.1.dsc
b831c14729e06a285cc13eba095817ce3b6d0ddf484b1264951b03ee4fe25bc9 245663 procenv_0.51.orig.tar.gz
bd3255b5a181a7bbd8f660ceb4f431513d2bdc39c0006af57b0ce89677a7ca8e 71156 procenv_0.51-0.1.debian.tar.xz
9cb1512ecf23668c07429eeb042bab736a008fca73d78037a104c03d234c6a98 7079 procenv_0.51-0.1_source.buildinfo
Files:
4124ec353dccd297af9fae9fec92b91a 2062 utils optional procenv_0.51-0.1.dsc
a1541f086f0b98e2ee0f7810b0140b7f 245663 utils optional procenv_0.51.orig.tar.gz
daa984726ef45913631484ff3c80cb80 71156 utils optional procenv_0.51-0.1.debian.tar.xz
c850de780fe5523793b98360185a592c 7079 utils optional procenv_0.51-0.1_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=vLa/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: