[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted fprintd 1.90.5-2 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2020 15:57:19 +0100
Source: fprintd
Architecture: source
Version: 1.90.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: FingerForce Team <fingerforce-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Marco Trevisan (Treviño) <marco@ubuntu.com>
Changes:
 fprintd (1.90.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * debian/patches: Make tests run with actual required libfprint version
   * debian/control: Remove test-only dependency on libfprint 1.90.4.
     Tests are now working with older libfprint versions too
   * debian/control: Add myself to Uploaders
   * debian/gbp.conf: Include suggested settings by GNOME team.
     Even if fprintd is not part of GNOME I think these settings are good
     practice anyways.
Checksums-Sha1:
 af8dbf352e7510352ae58deb90acf1fccd23b44b 2491 fprintd_1.90.5-2.dsc
 f951d4cfad3790bdd8cca3d66876959bbcdf0872 7472 fprintd_1.90.5-2.debian.tar.xz
 979098cbda9f421d6982dffeb15a0e0a68949c7f 10317 fprintd_1.90.5-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 4268bdf34fc6766bf8b5f4f89ad988c1e7bfe076620692ff240bee94055f54bd 2491 fprintd_1.90.5-2.dsc
 95bf80effabc96d2eeb27c3ead087674df0d7829beedc1fa0eee84b3767412bf 7472 fprintd_1.90.5-2.debian.tar.xz
 259fa7ad79ca27c8b6f7ed5e4e716cf12f075725dcc358f64f94f87b0a3ab70e 10317 fprintd_1.90.5-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
 f0b9e721528f143bd5d4f6440d595874 2491 misc optional fprintd_1.90.5-2.dsc
 dff184e55a68d9988baf29faadd74f1b 7472 misc optional fprintd_1.90.5-2.debian.tar.xz
 7c8515642d11c0c513e039bfedbcefd9 10317 misc optional fprintd_1.90.5-2_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=lQJr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: