Accepted bmap-tools 3.5-3 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 14:50:10 +0000
Source: bmap-tools
Architecture: source
Version: 3.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Changed-By: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Changes:
bmap-tools (3.5-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Standards-Version: 4.5.0 (no changes required)
* d/salsa-ci.yml: Request standard CI on salsa.debian.org
* d/p/test_api_base-Skip-test-if-filesystem-is-unsuitable.patch:
Skip tests if the filesystem cannot support them, for example when
building on disorderfs
* Mark both patches as applied upstream
* Use debhelper-compat 12
* Set upstream metadata fields: Bug-Database, Bug-Submit, Repository,
Repository-Browse
* Canonicalize case of Upstream-Name in d/copyright
* Fix day-of-week for changelog entry 0.1.0
* Standards-Version: 4.5.1 (no changes required)
* Set development branch to debian/latest
* d/tests/smoke: Remove compatibility with old autopkgtest versions
* debian/tests: Update test web server from Flatpak
Checksums-Sha1:
08eb6451dac73b36cbce68f86c6cc7a54d1a2959 2102 bmap-tools_3.5-3.dsc
a18452879de899a25a40dfe807efcc3bbc86c833 8052 bmap-tools_3.5-3.debian.tar.xz
39c9b486275a3a8e08163ca1143d4ca48e4fa230 6056 bmap-tools_3.5-3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
9d00a0246e9d4b4362bfebd23e65c568d7181f8e69bbb54c769fe7f6e28b3dc0 2102 bmap-tools_3.5-3.dsc
62487ece77aaa857a11a1ad6e0a923fd4f1a617305b21f62a2cf75837689fcba 8052 bmap-tools_3.5-3.debian.tar.xz
d97ea8c28b47faed5b844e43726a774875e453deac63847b62fe7758b70a7f60 6056 bmap-tools_3.5-3_source.buildinfo
Files:
4f84fff2db41c3223a6d2d1edc94b9ea 2102 utils optional bmap-tools_3.5-3.dsc
6f3a44abfcd67af89c8957fec0630e31 8052 utils optional bmap-tools_3.5-3.debian.tar.xz
cc7f05474d307da5b5a3ec1a47796bb2 6056 utils optional bmap-tools_3.5-3_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=fceJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: