Accepted qemu-sbuild-utils 0.2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 18:26:23 +0100
Source: qemu-sbuild-utils
Architecture: source
Version: 0.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org>
Changed-By: Christian Kastner <ckk@debian.org>
Changes:
qemu-sbuild-utils (0.2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* qemu-sbuild-create:
- Add documentation for /shared mountpoint
- Drop --mod-script option
- When building for experimental, debootstrap unstable
This was the intention and how the man page documents it, but somehow
this got overlooked
* qemu-sbuild-update:
- Explicitly set DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
- Add --arch option, for when auto-guessing fails
* qemu-sbuild:
- Add --overlay-dir option (needed for larger builds)
* all: Set NAME for man pages
Checksums-Sha1:
45611f2da8382adc6a1250d8ff3031d4f00b6bfb 1713 qemu-sbuild-utils_0.2.dsc
b0af41511ef6e83b97c0b1b4e2fddfafa4f816c6 10216 qemu-sbuild-utils_0.2.tar.xz
08a4d2add86f134c1f3f3e90f1ddc41293bdb6c0 6060 qemu-sbuild-utils_0.2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
7a3c11ed7ef6abd8f47c14a29e8d2b350a2759720a08645e865b6869c5fae010 1713 qemu-sbuild-utils_0.2.dsc
a7256840f4139515b328fffced5457b773c8198200761ea526f14111b615c392 10216 qemu-sbuild-utils_0.2.tar.xz
842d831b0fb148210ebec71e2a7e92dc7bb451b54b6067d7246c83dff0ae6cae 6060 qemu-sbuild-utils_0.2_source.buildinfo
Files:
c2d89cd9e04a90abe98492ad50e6e953 1713 devel optional qemu-sbuild-utils_0.2.dsc
031a436e1aef04008159ed78b63ba79f 10216 devel optional qemu-sbuild-utils_0.2.tar.xz
a44d9a262d47fcec4e321a3e75df5b17 6060 devel optional qemu-sbuild-utils_0.2_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=M9Xt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: