[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted aflplusplus 2.68c-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 12:06:15 +0100
Source: aflplusplus
Architecture: source
Version: 2.68c-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Security Tools <team+pkg-security@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Raphaël Hertzog <raphael@offensive-security.com>
Closes: 969320 973557 974783
Changes:
 aflplusplus (2.68c-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version 2.68c
   * Add a patch to improve reproducibility (Closes: #969320)
   * Improve long description to make it clear that afl is unmaintained
     (Closes: #973557)
   * Switch to clang/LLVM 11 (Closes: #974783)
   * Drop all patches, they have been merged upstream.
Checksums-Sha1:
 cd1a0c0c4363569948bdd643f494daa2750e3785 2067 aflplusplus_2.68c-1.dsc
 a4f60d10495d17591614aab99a4011d3ea99959c 1675912 aflplusplus_2.68c.orig.tar.gz
 4505362444b6aa24aa31a374089311106e36e319 5608 aflplusplus_2.68c-1.debian.tar.xz
 2a52ee3eddbb50c7afe076d4e5d7142757da08a8 6880 aflplusplus_2.68c-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 38a6c5ac7f8511d53da08fdba241fe506ccfd022cab88a3d6c1f147dccf1754e 2067 aflplusplus_2.68c-1.dsc
 862e155c97737770baa26ffedf324a7fa255b757c85b0c9a6f312264f2ca29c5 1675912 aflplusplus_2.68c.orig.tar.gz
 9f25f0b432632378b21e058c5349f2d2c21aa740a94d219f0e570118d6010595 5608 aflplusplus_2.68c-1.debian.tar.xz
 667eac12d2fe8a19dd594ac426f0b1b5d046e831e5b1075ead9797b8afa23915 6880 aflplusplus_2.68c-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 c1486836f6fc351c75559dae17507926 2067 devel optional aflplusplus_2.68c-1.dsc
 d193b5f93e53d0acb749fcf01faf27f7 1675912 devel optional aflplusplus_2.68c.orig.tar.gz
 5b73e2174f7e14a36d00eba619e5cd17 5608 devel optional aflplusplus_2.68c-1.debian.tar.xz
 894849da6b0a04bc15aa1e94b648aaf1 6880 devel optional aflplusplus_2.68c-1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Signed by Raphael Hertzog

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEE1823g1EQnhJ1LsbSA4gdq+vCmrkFAl+zsksACgkQA4gdq+vC
mrnPTgf/XAflHEk0DM/cBlgDGQYoz0QInWRrkx8E43R5Cx589czosZfYvdZ9xs0u
iwEYZo5Fz2q6tmbPbKzgPz4qdXlKFoO+KHK2Ne3aC9k7Xtxw3cSKNDAsbAeDE5l3
YqLPxhuivxbwPGwceoQ4mycYZeSChtPn4NvrPYw6zG8qKce3XFGPmmBN00QTol+3
9kXWvXfI1HXM7XuVzCUUXTeOvCExouEST1bpZd1I0LP/Ca/zfQv9XEpBcpADskOR
9WRw+hczjy2b68JZzePqOI11hT055I3pg+4kxfeDgmA3Q1AFHDLUSUJxWS4PMYtC
3VxPX/+AlxgzIXXkEd+MJtEksoxReg==
=JBim
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: