Accepted metakernel 0.27.1-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 16:18:32 -0500
Source: metakernel
Architecture: source
Version: 0.27.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Python Team <team+python@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Joseph Nahmias <jello@debian.org>
Changes:
metakernel (0.27.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* [28794c7] New upstream version 0.27.1
* [801da81] add missing deps for upstream testsuite
* [14fcc15] ensure ipcluster uses same pyversion as pytest
* [52cbe79] enable diffoscope for salsa-ci reprotest
* [aa8db15] add man-db dep for upstream testsuite
* [f99f8f7] update Vcs URLs for DPT transition
* [1bf7e4f] d/watch: do not run uupdate
* [f7bdcec] don't build documentation if nodoc is requested
* [1c85491] annotate Build-Deps for nodoc and nocheck DEB_BUILD_PROFILES
Checksums-Sha1:
a7488656b68166590ec2a97225d005a6c98dff38 2650 metakernel_0.27.1-1.dsc
2bd91a392502706cc96ed71f939bf84625545d87 288976 metakernel_0.27.1.orig.tar.gz
3f0f93b1a99613b2cf32ef68c573adc569f67a5b 5332 metakernel_0.27.1-1.debian.tar.xz
6041166bed95fca4773043d7a3d7fa13309294a4 9887 metakernel_0.27.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
651aefe04aa1aec05ad2c8e188ccea9156aef482e2c8eefb63ee3f601b6a3015 2650 metakernel_0.27.1-1.dsc
96ddb3955a4e1e543b478c0d17e396da9e8bbcc9db067a89fef0fcc644432088 288976 metakernel_0.27.1.orig.tar.gz
0d54ff8ee99741dd4e721200d5f848bb867790bdf8830f1f971127c8ebf02715 5332 metakernel_0.27.1-1.debian.tar.xz
773b6ed52f0f01ea1f1798ad4111ceeead733a6046a56899ef77c26badb6bc8f 9887 metakernel_0.27.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
f5ce22cebe77caf3cb3e59c9605737cc 2650 python optional metakernel_0.27.1-1.dsc
81be10c8ae6eaf2bef47e2259a9fcef0 288976 python optional metakernel_0.27.1.orig.tar.gz
83802061e4086d8859f8b60862006d04 5332 python optional metakernel_0.27.1-1.debian.tar.xz
15ef431c646453450e41b96e5803a35b 9887 python optional metakernel_0.27.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Ygqu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: