[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted r-bioc-rtracklayer 1.50.0-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 13:30:01 +0100
Source: r-bioc-rtracklayer
Architecture: source
Version: 1.50.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian R Packages Maintainers <r-pkg-team@alioth-lists.debian.net>
Changed-By: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
Changes:
 r-bioc-rtracklayer (1.50.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version
   * debhelper-compat 13 (routine-update)
   * No tab in license text (routine-update)
Checksums-Sha1:
 d5cd48677a7a76e364eb5be607e56ab0b81b1d30 2444 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.50.0-1.dsc
 e70ccbea944af40aadd8634279ee4bf4060ee584 6369416 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.50.0.orig.tar.gz
 3eab1701f70092d10e570adb1a07702a449eda9d 26956 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.50.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 85a501581c63dc5a449e610141a0a5bafe6fd021 10116 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.50.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 54281f03f1b62d0bc089f6bb4b40f7cfe1d3c0f210b28744160071eecc7f45ab 2444 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.50.0-1.dsc
 a8df02d9508b112c8553d6862e8466ffd1fd5783e5ffcc036adfcbdf2eacf18b 6369416 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.50.0.orig.tar.gz
 3f9c813f844cae4d7c3eb96c3f03b295ef009d36e755ae7fb19610981277e5eb 26956 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.50.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 6bcf7e5e409302996fcb1645da0bffac8136d742e9a4b639aea72e2056100e2d 10116 r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.50.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 dce02e303e4b56bda5887800ec882b2e 2444 gnu-r optional r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.50.0-1.dsc
 4cfe973ff5d2be86eb1cd0cd88287b01 6369416 gnu-r optional r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.50.0.orig.tar.gz
 034e39bfcf838a63852eb616ea9c76aa 26956 gnu-r optional r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.50.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 631b1d3af10df2dcdbdbfbaad7bf6bfb 10116 gnu-r optional r-bioc-rtracklayer_1.50.0-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=scI/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: