Accepted hugo 0.76.5-2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 19:12:04 -0600
Source: hugo
Architecture: source
Version: 0.76.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Go Packaging Team <team+pkg-go@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Anthony Fok <foka@debian.org>
Closes: 973105
Changes:
hugo (0.76.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Restore dependency on golang-github-russross-blackfriday-dev (v1)
and remove our local copy and my kludge in debian/rules.
Thanks to the change Shengjing made to golang-blackfriday-v2/2.0.1-3,
golang-github-russross-blackfriday-dev and
golang-github-russross-blackfriday-v2-dev may now co-exist,
and my previous kludge is now unnecessary and even causes a FTBFS bug.
(Closes: #973105)
* Build-depend on golang-github-evanw-esbuild-dev (>= 0.7.9)
and remove our temporary local copy
* Change build-dependency on golang-github-nicksnyder-go-i18n-dev (>= 2.1.1)
to golang-github-nicksnyder-go-i18n.v2-dev (>= 2.1.1)
* debian/copyright: Add merge-release.sh to the Files field
Checksums-Sha1:
6662e4fb558263e74d41af85b288cf8781282fb3 4904 hugo_0.76.5-2.dsc
ac27e0baca557e7dbdad8732c1ee005d52312201 642656 hugo_0.76.5-2.debian.tar.xz
ccd600a3258fb73d0d0d682a77d6ffd2474c4022 14405 hugo_0.76.5-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
930581e4b86165f31d847b45afd49c6c08e5736b1ada6da1e6dc1842caadd5c4 4904 hugo_0.76.5-2.dsc
4a5b003e9ca2fc93d8bb8b4fa05f49d8596b172387dcd8cb59975df978172db6 642656 hugo_0.76.5-2.debian.tar.xz
0fee18bdafb8d2c15ac2b2770266be836624fa9e8d6a05bbd3e3e6515a695059 14405 hugo_0.76.5-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
cc7ac8ede112dbef64e7e60a3ef7a907 4904 web optional hugo_0.76.5-2.dsc
135929b227b6b2066b7467e50af7490f 642656 web optional hugo_0.76.5-2.debian.tar.xz
1841a346735c62263e3910306a71a564 14405 web optional hugo_0.76.5-2_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=ury9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: