Accepted lxtask 0.1.10-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2020 22:51:43 +0200
Source: lxtask
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian LXDE Maintainers <pkg-lxde-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andriy Grytsenko <andrej@rep.kiev.ua>
Changes:
lxtask (0.1.10-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Merging upstream version 0.1.10.
* Removing lxtask-fix-no-common.patch which is included in upstream sources.
* Reposition Vcs-* to the Debian Salsa.
* Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.0.
* Adding 'Rules-Requires-Root: no' header.
* Dropping lxtask-dbg package in favor of autogenerated debug one.
Checksums-Sha1:
7517c08e68447cee7de344c306df64802addf1fd 1987 lxtask_0.1.10-1.dsc
0c565b8157ee5a4b87db6b65effd687e8bc7bf72 138116 lxtask_0.1.10.orig.tar.xz
a56f921469917444eb87f20854d66dbf8739cad3 4136 lxtask_0.1.10-1.debian.tar.xz
9d80c83faeec7cb9535721ea64f04b40128ddb36 10785 lxtask_0.1.10-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
f149bc81d961db17740166dc6890f4e4bea198bbfa6de1536e143694efeedebb 1987 lxtask_0.1.10-1.dsc
2216df9bc4bb2d80733e788966512ac58c421e0a0a1ff85210f34a29d1eb4e2c 138116 lxtask_0.1.10.orig.tar.xz
7a35a9fd288272853da011b17b4cdd1854d0e028b1d36403c7f7cd0448d9c4f1 4136 lxtask_0.1.10-1.debian.tar.xz
817b408d2b2d995adc829544badd06557dac1b8aa0dc8771d5f692a088f19086 10785 lxtask_0.1.10-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
cc6a248bd9210d8345ce89854582c6e2 1987 x11 optional lxtask_0.1.10-1.dsc
27b5258847afc237a5b89666e7a8b45b 138116 x11 optional lxtask_0.1.10.orig.tar.xz
7a38fcbbd677c1dce9e50dea09da8659 4136 x11 optional lxtask_0.1.10-1.debian.tar.xz
d5ee283a7ca9a35c656a738c2b625d5a 10785 x11 optional lxtask_0.1.10-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=B71H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: