Accepted ros-image-pipeline 1.15.2-2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 00:15:51 +0100
Source: ros-image-pipeline
Architecture: source
Version: 1.15.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers <debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Johannes 'josch' Schauer <josch@debian.org>
Changes:
ros-image-pipeline (1.15.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Jochen Sprickerhof ]
* Fix library dependency libdepth-image-proc0d -> libimage-proc0d
* Add patch for missing CATKIN_DEPENDS of depth_image_proc on image_geometry
and sensor_msgs
.
[ Johannes 'josch' Schauer ]
* debian/control: libstereo-image-proc-dev: add missing Depends on
libimage-proc-dev
* debian/patches/0004-Add-missing-CATKIN_DEPENDS.patch: also fix
depth_image_proc/package.xml
* debian/control: remove Multi-Arch: same from libimage-proc-dev because
image_procConfig.cmake hardcodes paths to the libraries which includes
their architecture. This makes the files different on different
architectures and thus not co-installable.
Checksums-Sha1:
d7cdfda539bcd04f37fd5068a4c7ce8d6990f540 4508 ros-image-pipeline_1.15.2-2.dsc
8907ffe8e3d64625719455a44c2bf15bfb891cd3 7196 ros-image-pipeline_1.15.2-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
fefbb4e376785f68801e9bf8839c99c94398dd815deb6f0cb6b1593b04e979f9 4508 ros-image-pipeline_1.15.2-2.dsc
2f94b90a814822b7476355c53cb4b8c7e06094b62ad951ec6081bd66e5dd423b 7196 ros-image-pipeline_1.15.2-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
1062c00fdfdbc55a42009f97cc78de55 4508 libs optional ros-image-pipeline_1.15.2-2.dsc
9683848da9e1969f6f5e2c008135f456 7196 libs optional ros-image-pipeline_1.15.2-2.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=yFGJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: