[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted tomcat9 9.0.39-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:16:57 +0200
Source: tomcat9
Architecture: source
Version: 9.0.39-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org>
Closes: 966158
Changes:
 tomcat9 (9.0.39-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release
     - Refreshed the patches
   * tomcat9-user now depends on netcat-openbsd instead of netcat
     (Closes: #966158)
Checksums-Sha1:
 afe944f3dbf857ecf6016b5b60043c86c3e7f059 2748 tomcat9_9.0.39-1.dsc
 915c37c8d22631b039fea43b191efd62a3bb619f 3926712 tomcat9_9.0.39.orig.tar.xz
 92eb7a40d6d6bf909744e49b6baab7e230e2c0f5 33624 tomcat9_9.0.39-1.debian.tar.xz
 c0e868c75874c7a1b19bddb9a43378a1e1f17582 11961 tomcat9_9.0.39-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 1fd8a96bf55a9bcef530f2c34bb95e752b0df27eb553954be43701a7d6b652fd 2748 tomcat9_9.0.39-1.dsc
 6f6ae8428e671f7967ef50b012fdfcf8dc8b5f2827d80fbfe4cbdc3da84b920f 3926712 tomcat9_9.0.39.orig.tar.xz
 4b14b67020994b4b324435f61878b61e5faebd1ba59026c172948ae7f9fd302b 33624 tomcat9_9.0.39-1.debian.tar.xz
 e0dad77c523cd38734e36416f6ed8e6b0e7a61905710c7ff155cb0049e8f7350 11961 tomcat9_9.0.39-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 4942488e270009631552f900e7fe47f0 2748 java optional tomcat9_9.0.39-1.dsc
 ba31b6f75b1370637fcaf5608e0a5090 3926712 java optional tomcat9_9.0.39.orig.tar.xz
 6458a18443af80da4a0605f56c2605b3 33624 java optional tomcat9_9.0.39-1.debian.tar.xz
 f99f6a70ff97f5ca7ceabe8ca09369ef 11961 java optional tomcat9_9.0.39-1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=oE+W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: