Accepted silkaj 0.7.6-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2020 02:31:28 +0200
Source: silkaj
Architecture: source
Version: 0.7.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Cryptocoin Team <team+cryptocoin@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
Changes:
silkaj (0.7.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ upstream ]
* new release(s)
.
[ Jonas Smedegaard ]
* build-depend on python3-duniterpy python3-texttable
(not python3-pyaes python3-scrypt)
* declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.5.0
* fix suggest bash-completion
* fix consistently pass buildsystem to dh sequencer
* update patch 2001
* use debhelper compatibility level 12 (not 9);
build-depend on debhelper-compat
dh-sequence-bash-completion dh-sequence-python3
(not bash-completion debhelper)
* update autopkgtest
Checksums-Sha1:
e96a92dc5b860a6b457be3a6dd2482911eb01b33 2223 silkaj_0.7.6-1.dsc
66a1f3298b46a8faf4a22f3bedbc8df7e16c7e7d 249724 silkaj_0.7.6.orig.tar.bz2
8da204ea4011640a5813299939a0d4e111af5b26 17232 silkaj_0.7.6-1.debian.tar.xz
809b1fad971b34a8772af9cb4b2d2e56d8873725 6856 silkaj_0.7.6-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
e02d9ba5345d038b224d42d35c168dd323927be06dafa2f2411aba21987e1ead 2223 silkaj_0.7.6-1.dsc
4b7fe0c946634f3971d937559f45e0067573834350df73fbfcd28dbad31fcd75 249724 silkaj_0.7.6.orig.tar.bz2
fd0ee60d8119ba12559e5330f3ad0c164c210661b3161e5289e1766fb430f765 17232 silkaj_0.7.6-1.debian.tar.xz
0948ee6803a497a3e37ffcfb1a1e8d0f0b8cc279f412125a4f0667fe1b716046 6856 silkaj_0.7.6-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
0e308284952069db5e94aabf0dbec996 2223 utils optional silkaj_0.7.6-1.dsc
7284421728dc2d86b32fc817dfbdb273 249724 utils optional silkaj_0.7.6.orig.tar.bz2
f8e8a5f598504d2d6e0d6b5bc3b3e11a 17232 utils optional silkaj_0.7.6-1.debian.tar.xz
6acff676b92ebdbdf0be799ffbd8c6e3 6856 utils optional silkaj_0.7.6-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEn+Ppw2aRpp/1PMaELHwxRsGgASEFAl9+YqAACgkQLHwxRsGg
ASFuuQ/7BdeNfACdxWamB5q6a6VGy3s9/KKP9+1jS7ZCvbklSh/7SqD1n5FC/9xe
37SePdpCUd5RV1JbcbuuewN4aZm38TlwxlBN62tmqb+ykxeb84wECxUgr4IMwAI3
RDnG7UaLut2ShWVMg5HlIKJAGmnjtS1C89XXbRY8jskoHL98uK1osbHr3wGyoC7A
WWQGRjWVJaSSUw5s63U+uSyQzxquXSPxBC0GDTzfGei9WIWOJ2cJJOb0aR5Vqu48
iHVEDrNEiAmA8ddTvyRSSI1jAdcTM5307pa3VIF3Eo6m7rqxEc1F7wXkKg2Cm3WV
fmux8R4+fThPbmfWTBNk+sX0cLYoRgF5+MvB28RGJw2A67WMNi1qoUl1u7GNZYD7
tWY6+YNWG5obHgFM/ckTqqd8yyfUA1H8xvy4Y/UD6K11Ia+0QZAj3jo2nJ9RqR4r
rO011B542WDSizxQxroX/0bZzBYc6oH/K7swnOzvRXyyqTfRg/k0IAVScMWDZSDB
l+nqrm55rjBYtXx2ZlB6U699inF/H9vb/QkIMitdoRVskP41QTtCcGuEUYkvoFKN
P/3uJwRWkEhZ11oFiL5nRjoyNXepcu67IqIhI3ROvAW5/XiTUw4oc5OaBFfB1uNJ
4X0P9+nnf2OnApOPbhns7qTcE3PqsDIc1bKdPegJcn8IV3ZFrdk=
=X+rB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: