Accepted pd-mrpeach 0.1~svn17666-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 23:13:34 +0200
Source: pd-mrpeach
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1~svn17666-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers <debian-multimedia@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org>
Changes:
pd-mrpeach (0.1~svn17666-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version 0.1~svn17666
* Regenerate upstream changelog
* Upstream no longer builds [str]
* on Debian we have long shipped a dummy anyhow
* Use system-provided pd-lib-builder
* Drop subdirectory builds
* pd-mrpeach now is a superset of the other binary packages
* Declare conflicts between dbgsym packages
* Add lintian-override for not-linked-against-libc false-positive
* Bumped dh-compat to 13
* Install files from /usr/lib/pd/extra to keep dh_missing happy
Checksums-Sha1:
81918351caf4dca73db3ab96e6b7b6efdfbef7be 2456 pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17666-1.dsc
4518d15620a34296982091ccb6e36a36a5f6544a 286113 pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17666.orig.tar.gz
3a47a6df229450f70b4c47b7c5146f33d3457ddb 23236 pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17666-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
b0317ae2c73dc5cb20110f278ee9a2a9df301e8483639af5cee89824e19b8913 2456 pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17666-1.dsc
62ab298ff92833ab237b25da2a45b2d7b14fd2a651e8377bbb72a6950c2a3294 286113 pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17666.orig.tar.gz
6f099152962d9b25f094b16821f72b0916de9a095589130a49048b556c81fbea 23236 pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17666-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
8276c4ec5b93fae9d307f17c7ad7dad4 2456 sound optional pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17666-1.dsc
c7eb7b08a6e5af0e51beb9288e2986ad 286113 sound optional pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17666.orig.tar.gz
3b2bfeda99d7fae317a1fdf2fac39aa6 23236 sound optional pd-mrpeach_0.1~svn17666-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=mVyj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: