[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted carbon-c-relay 3.7-3 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 00:54:04 +0200
Source: carbon-c-relay
Architecture: source
Version: 3.7-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Bernd Zeimetz <bzed@debian.org>
Changed-By: Bernd Zeimetz <bzed@debian.org>
Changes:
 carbon-c-relay (3.7-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * [525982a] try again to avoid re-using used ports
   * [640a83f] Avoid printing aggregator output
     The aggregator testcase fails on buildds and in the CI.
     Seems to be a timing issue. Raise the interval so it won't be
     printed hopefully.
   * [8e2c9a2] Fix expire/interval time for test
Checksums-Sha1:
 8d221ace9d5e342cd2c5ef5beadbaf1f4b99a40d 1920 carbon-c-relay_3.7-3.dsc
 89a2f95654d38a0377076accd3117efdb77d91ee 6876 carbon-c-relay_3.7-3.debian.tar.xz
 ff5e62721b3cec097d35e5dd6115844cf59d6c3c 5861 carbon-c-relay_3.7-3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 847fe6868d3e13c4c9b12b327eee6b9ea38d7bd4717ced2804da816a9a96505e 1920 carbon-c-relay_3.7-3.dsc
 720e55f048b1451a1497596e305b747b261a250b56bff8972b8e933550069acd 6876 carbon-c-relay_3.7-3.debian.tar.xz
 6790580d9c90911f28e0cccc2a55a8f49d9f87dc5954a604f3af242c80a488d7 5861 carbon-c-relay_3.7-3_source.buildinfo
Files:
 a2ab4228b0ad2a91dbdceec5a902b4c7 1920 net optional carbon-c-relay_3.7-3.dsc
 87c8e2d55d6ef30c223471c08575ed01 6876 net optional carbon-c-relay_3.7-3.debian.tar.xz
 ab30f6e319197d6a7b6cef6c5dcc8cb8 5861 net optional carbon-c-relay_3.7-3_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=B69l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: