Accepted guile-3.0 3.0.4-3 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 14:48:42 -0500
Source: guile-3.0
Architecture: source
Version: 3.0.4-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
Changed-By: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
Changes:
guile-3.0 (3.0.4-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Fix "non-revealed port is closed" ports.test. Don't close the test
port's file descriptor because the port still has a reference to it,
and could still close it at any time when finally garbage collected.
This was reliably breaking subsequent tests on s390x. Add
0007-Fix-non-revealed-port-is-closed-ports.test.patch to fix the
problem.
Checksums-Sha1:
7d2df6b456d160b08b6c5766e984382df0a7219a 2128 guile-3.0_3.0.4-3.dsc
840daf46c8985ecf29a5ede625a924e59773cec0 24964 guile-3.0_3.0.4-3.debian.tar.xz
f884ee0d0d7d6cf3f032f0251aa668f8f576ec57 7530 guile-3.0_3.0.4-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
72fb51240e270fe119b3b9874992724d0a9e4f3bb8a625350b85a0bcf0fa935c 2128 guile-3.0_3.0.4-3.dsc
5fd2c166a2cdc06add65ebc91f229226953d86cf30a0b9286206f3d5f92edb67 24964 guile-3.0_3.0.4-3.debian.tar.xz
a8212eefb5a02c9ddfc145c1ab4cb35cf313afb2955ccf93a4c360653a2448e8 7530 guile-3.0_3.0.4-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
400e6e9481fad94ae96bbe8812b990e6 2128 interpreters optional guile-3.0_3.0.4-3.dsc
192681fcaea486c1bd25ee055fc88705 24964 interpreters optional guile-3.0_3.0.4-3.debian.tar.xz
3e643451e1e359ce224eb3557a30c097 7530 interpreters optional guile-3.0_3.0.4-3_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=OzQi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: