Accepted lintian-brush 0.78 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 18:01:20 +0000
Source: lintian-brush
Architecture: source
Version: 0.78
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
Changed-By: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@debian.org>
Changes:
lintian-brush (0.78) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Support creating patches to upstreams in the case when there are no
existing upstream patches.
* Depend on newer debmutate (>= 0.6).
* When removing lintian overrides, also drop the associated comments.
* In control files, don't create new empty lines when stripping
whitespace.
* Bump default urgency to medium. See
https://salsa.debian.org/jelmer/debian-janitor/-/issues/138
* Fix branch from vcswatch in --diligent mode.
* apply-multiarch-hints: fix Changes-by field.
* debianize: Make breezy-debian optional.
* Add debianize(1) manpage.
Checksums-Sha1:
18fc0d16eec9f321b907a09e9a7f1c006d90071e 2083 lintian-brush_0.78.dsc
a9fdb527235f0cf311dcf935e93bd32b8a0aeb06 869572 lintian-brush_0.78.tar.xz
640d1eca2aa3aa8ec148ec299078a60a11f20b16 11840 lintian-brush_0.78_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
49c707e13e6f28705c3758249d953d6f57fe0fee8cc9602cdadf7ac4a45b181b 2083 lintian-brush_0.78.dsc
6f98fd86d467412cda6b720fa15bf85e653dddda3cbb65cf6fb5c087444238db 869572 lintian-brush_0.78.tar.xz
bf5fc51037ee6ffae12789539906567647025ccfd5dc73d030003fcfc0a72cfe 11840 lintian-brush_0.78_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
0f8e7e78b007020868d0767f4dce8c94 2083 devel optional lintian-brush_0.78.dsc
5a15f57558d999af5b7921a387446e5d 869572 devel optional lintian-brush_0.78.tar.xz
4c7618eaa79a878e06acd13a8a2fffdb 11840 devel optional lintian-brush_0.78_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=cNwe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: