Accepted scheme48 1.9.2-2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 21:41:05 +0200
Source: scheme48
Architecture: source
Version: 1.9.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Thorsten Alteholz <debian@alteholz.de>
Changed-By: Thorsten Alteholz <debian@alteholz.de>
Closes: 968212
Changes:
scheme48 (1.9.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* debian/control: use dh12
* debian/control: standard changed to 4.5.0 (no changes)
* debian/control: use better VCS URLs
* debian/missing-sources: add m4 directory; while preparing the release
of version 1.9, upstream moved the S48_* macros
from configure.in to m4/ but forgot to include
this directory in the release tarball. It is
added to missing-sources now. If you want to
rebuild configure please consider:
env ACLOCAL="aclocal -I m4" autoreconf -v -i
(Closes: #968212)
* debian/watch: use https
Checksums-Sha1:
f0a0d324d2664850e446686f87fc7af28032c6c4 2115 scheme48_1.9.2-2.dsc
c4ea79ffaa62ccdbd7bcd183a2493bbab3fc6cf9 19500 scheme48_1.9.2-2.debian.tar.xz
36f6eb00b7b550c909fa1113b4b235371d8c540b 8387 scheme48_1.9.2-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
d72f0225035297e879449f3b101f83a2cedd071788f4dbe8b35b98f360352cd5 2115 scheme48_1.9.2-2.dsc
065637426836041ceec9e7529d72dc78a48a064da717a17f3de0a54e5f7238ff 19500 scheme48_1.9.2-2.debian.tar.xz
3bc2809e9346a622cca1336c546fe6272ee408afa2ac48fa57154cb47273a319 8387 scheme48_1.9.2-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
7f96f83af02d6b795bacac45d7d2f748 2115 lisp optional scheme48_1.9.2-2.dsc
9846b3dfa4060dd4dd318a0b7cffe2e1 19500 lisp optional scheme48_1.9.2-2.debian.tar.xz
c65e122fa76233c94f10c24d5a6feb5c 8387 lisp optional scheme48_1.9.2-2_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=LoeI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: