Accepted coderay 1.1.3-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:09:15 +0900
Source: coderay
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1.3-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers <pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai) <dai@debian.org>
Changes:
coderay (1.1.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version 1.1.3
* d/watch: scan github instead of gemwatch due to lack of test materials
* d/p/0000-restore_tests_and_rake_tasks_v1.1.2.patch: removed.
due to use full source tarball instead of rubygem.
* d/p/0004-Add-Ruby-2.6-support.patch: removed.
due to imported to new release.
* d/p/0005-do_not_use_git_ls-files.patch: added. do not use `git ls-files`
* d/p/{0001,0003]*: eliminate lintian warning: patch-not-forwarded-upstream
* d/p/series: updated.
* d/control: add ruby-rspec-core, ruby-rspec-expectations, ruby-simplecov,
ruby-rspec-mocks to B-D.
* d/control: eliminate lintian warning: cute-field.
* d/rules: remove simplecov directory when dh_clean.
Checksums-Sha1:
aca45bf87afaafe822399fac16b07ac5ebfa665c 2255 coderay_1.1.3-1.dsc
b0a7cda5c6e1e5e2f569df9072e424652f569521 229139 coderay_1.1.3.orig.tar.gz
40420402e8ddf6faf08717b1a91cccac3b7038ff 7072 coderay_1.1.3-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
fd7771e231d671ff6a51c2c9ca5abb2043d067d7e1888fc1720597981df18754 2255 coderay_1.1.3-1.dsc
b69aa65951e5381fa807f347780030cfe557910427b5d26b9e0a309682186c8a 229139 coderay_1.1.3.orig.tar.gz
af6c6b41932b467ddd816b6c9171526bc9a74f38ee7ccabefa7410f8131c8580 7072 coderay_1.1.3-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
115dbd2f037e00f176e25569c593d0f3 2255 ruby optional coderay_1.1.3-1.dsc
d9b79bd7b8719c85549b2ee7717f0909 229139 ruby optional coderay_1.1.3.orig.tar.gz
0e3f856656aaea094e7c442e4d8388f0 7072 ruby optional coderay_1.1.3-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=K/Bx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: