Accepted netplan.io 0.99-3 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2020 10:14:32 +0200
Source: netplan.io
Architecture: source
Version: 0.99-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian netplan Maintainers <team+netplan@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andrej Shadura <andrewsh@debian.org>
Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed: 1874377 1874494 1875411
Changes:
netplan.io (0.99-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Upload to unstable.
* Merge changes from Ubuntu.
.
[ Lukas Märdian ]
* Add d/p/0001-Fix-LP-1874377-Not-connect-to-WiFi-after-netplan-app.patch:
- Seems like the 'netplan apply' command was not properly adopted when
wired wpa_supplicant support was introduced.
- Proper upstream fix, which handles edge cases better and contains tests
Fixes LP: #1874377.
* d/p/0001-Fix-autopkgtest-on-arm64-with-NM-1.24-146.patch
- Fix autopkgtest failure on arm64 in combination with new NM 1.24.
* d/p/0001-Call-daemon-reload-after-we-touched-systemd-unit-fil.patch
- Re-calculate systemd dependencies, after touching .service
units (LP: #1874494)
.
[ Heitor Alves de Siqueira ]
* d/p/0002-Fix-process_link_changes-handling-up-interfaces.patch:
- Fix process_link_changes handling 'up' interfaces (LP: #1875411)
.
netplan.io (0.99-2) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Split libnetplan off into separate packages.
* Force -fcommon to enable builds with GCC 10 to work around #957603.
Checksums-Sha1:
97750c5ebc4d6c37e950ae46c9c3212fe3e961d2 2232 netplan.io_0.99-3.dsc
03efb6a4c60a45c43172d3e41b58ed6797246323 9388 netplan.io_0.99-3.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
568adb7fa9544629ebe051ea11e04d79e43029c5511c2f11a5c5b9e3a4b7ac14 2232 netplan.io_0.99-3.dsc
41bb580d8ad9d18ed211a5768d26c29139d86f1a7a27fbefabc8691b8b438cd8 9388 netplan.io_0.99-3.debian.tar.xz
Files:
5f3eeb7ca1f6d25f54d1a93332728edf 2232 net optional netplan.io_0.99-3.dsc
433864bc01240d0ba572077afb2ca0df 9388 net optional netplan.io_0.99-3.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEeuS9ZL8A0js0NGiOXkCM2RzYOdIFAl8b6gYACgkQXkCM2RzY
OdJ2kAf/WuGodG8QQwMCcuhE1gYSnF/1VCT18siuUzZ6Adj2Me2HJkm9XmFuCCl6
GyQ9IegiFn/atqEOLRtU4xrKD1Dg9Yzn9gyAZzQO/K6T0dFmAnyW9/wDlJ5zerPb
XNIQ/AdeJA1tZ2fxarOcgplnYfmUa8KmCcm7g8D0nLEJ4OceFMMTVH0+jacbKsMe
RbpSGrt4yX/0mm8zmFzCnND65Juy01GItempcOvKZBzy0QlaHnwuvTLk1mw28Qih
oSe2XhVHO1uwwcQY7G+rxPOVEcFi0YXorJIac9foAifcz5pmupcgJN29iKVuBsBi
/DXPW9N+LVA4VaJD3tTnepwEmgvaxQ==
=hFqA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: