Accepted scdoc 1.11.0-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 16:07:49 +0200
Source: scdoc
Architecture: source
Version: 1.11.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Birger Schacht <birger@debian.org>
Changed-By: Birger Schacht <birger@debian.org>
Changes:
scdoc (1.11.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release
* d/rules and d/patches: dropped the patch to unset
upstreams LDFLAGS and instead set the variable in
d/rules; also did some cleanup in d/rules
* d/upstream/metadata: add Bug-Submit field
* d/control
+ change Maintainer field address to debian.org address
+ bump debhelper-compat version to 13
+ adjust VCS-* URLs to point to debian namespace
* Added a d/gbp.conf to specify default branch and pristine-tar
Checksums-Sha1:
77150000dabd3f5f66d2b0f6a17d8b7b8c92f019 1817 scdoc_1.11.0-1.dsc
2c577d22c39191af4333ad45f8614ccca3f2f461 12645 scdoc_1.11.0.orig.tar.gz
a609a9581564fa413f16e259e58d143a2864ca57 2672 scdoc_1.11.0-1.debian.tar.xz
04b53298f71c012d76198602d2fd5a04e4ba58cc 5514 scdoc_1.11.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
251430675997ef7adfa3be57878db820d5cd89ccd393cf2f0cc4cff19283b63e 1817 scdoc_1.11.0-1.dsc
45b0ac8bf787789db9ac6849d986abdd86f6e3a09fb2bc51fd15913d0aa6bf51 12645 scdoc_1.11.0.orig.tar.gz
2f76b668b100709c86ef565adc2dd829734431ab06ec792b4a1402c1739881fb 2672 scdoc_1.11.0-1.debian.tar.xz
de27bf2d464666081476ae2a0f164c6c41bb5e74e3d31fba9b8de645aeea4650 5514 scdoc_1.11.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
9c45753ea5a872c00ea5a4f2466ba7d9 1817 text optional scdoc_1.11.0-1.dsc
6c72295b0c0b71ccd5fd5281b40ce7d1 12645 text optional scdoc_1.11.0.orig.tar.gz
fd67dd52c41723f0cb19d711da80a696 2672 text optional scdoc_1.11.0-1.debian.tar.xz
9350fcf78299f1a8841a601f26d90bff 5514 text optional scdoc_1.11.0-1_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=oFzl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: