Accepted davmail 5.5.1.3299-2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 12:20:22 +0200
Source: davmail
Architecture: source
Version: 5.5.1.3299-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Alexandre Rossi <alexandre.rossi@gmail.com>
Changed-By: Alexandre Rossi <alexandre.rossi@gmail.com>
Closes: 959219
Changes:
davmail (5.5.1.3299-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Debian Janitor ]
* Refer to common license file for CC0-1.0.
* Update standards version to 4.5.0, no changes needed.
.
[ Alexandre Rossi ]
* use slightly modified upstream conf
* let davmail handle log rotation
* use DynamicUser if systemd
* drop now useless noosxtray build flag
* fix _davmail user creation using --force-badname (Closes: #959219)
* postinst: dpkg-stateoverride use --force-all instead of deprecated --force
* d/rules: explain why override jh_depends
Checksums-Sha1:
80a4ebc98d1cf8688861ebe284608e452fd0004c 2339 davmail_5.5.1.3299-2.dsc
29dcb4ef3121cb81a0c29b767527a1f64f51e25e 11928 davmail_5.5.1.3299-2.debian.tar.xz
37525be13322b4c788854b57ba58e1524a59d3da 14970 davmail_5.5.1.3299-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
7b09dc4b8a242babf52ee95f635bc51192290d48ec68cfb504c4aa7404326c43 2339 davmail_5.5.1.3299-2.dsc
136693b28ab2c2c428ae7fc32ff098a01eac7c8350e87463bfa83fa992ee8243 11928 davmail_5.5.1.3299-2.debian.tar.xz
a1b9b5ece53a97e7a882e23885c237e189200932cabd4ae222c4082b36a3ce04 14970 davmail_5.5.1.3299-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
24616d980af9e3ec70f42144ae8ffd8c 2339 net optional davmail_5.5.1.3299-2.dsc
a9a54ff2eeaa01833f62133c59394c1f 11928 net optional davmail_5.5.1.3299-2.debian.tar.xz
1c46a9bfb602234b2108df649b8cc8a0 14970 net optional davmail_5.5.1.3299-2_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=9X+1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: