Accepted linux-signed-arm64 5.6.14+2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 18:50:00 +0100
Source: linux-signed-arm64
Architecture: source
Version: 5.6.14+2
Distribution: sid
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org>
Changes:
linux-signed-arm64 (5.6.14+2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Sign kernel from linux 5.6.14-2
.
[ Vagrant Cascadian ]
* [arm64] Add pwm-sun4i to fb-modules udeb.
.
[ Salvatore Bonaccorso ]
* kernel/relay.c: handle alloc_percpu returning NULL in relay_open
(CVE-2019-19462)
* fs/binfmt_elf.c: allocate initialized memory in fill_thread_core_info()
(CVE-2020-10732)
* mm: Fix mremap not considering huge pmd devmap (CVE-2020-10757)
.
[ Ben Hutchings ]
* [x86] Add support for mitigation of Special Register Buffer Data Sampling
(SRBDS) (CVE-2020-0543):
- x86/cpu: Add 'table' argument to cpu_matches()
- x86/speculation: Add Special Register Buffer Data Sampling (SRBDS)
mitigation
- x86/speculation: Add SRBDS vulnerability and mitigation documentation
- x86/speculation: Add Ivy Bridge to affected list
* [x86] speculation: Do not match steppings, to avoid an ABI change
Checksums-Sha1:
52e0ee87e9141f4369afab6e8ce2aa89d3a35d56 7142 linux-signed-arm64_5.6.14+2.dsc
0d740d99c4669ca0f2e6fe8b433bcbe23eea0b0b 2044392 linux-signed-arm64_5.6.14+2.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
8ab26bd3f003230e6be864a8ab7ffdc328603bd2d233749f4d0cc79d36f2da29 7142 linux-signed-arm64_5.6.14+2.dsc
472ab6b4514fa5b7300b3bb6b28acb3a42a0af083c7dd54292a22e84f3a11f0e 2044392 linux-signed-arm64_5.6.14+2.tar.xz
Files:
9f62ff076316f3ee690ca8111a87548e 7142 kernel optional linux-signed-arm64_5.6.14+2.dsc
8024fec80f3028a59f718e17d06581da 2044392 kernel optional linux-signed-arm64_5.6.14+2.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=kxNx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: