[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted ros-rospack 2.6.2-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 13:58:12 +0200
Source: ros-rospack
Architecture: source
Version: 2.6.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers <debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Jochen Sprickerhof <jspricke@debian.org>
Changes:
 ros-rospack (2.6.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * simplify d/watch
   * New upstream version 2.6.2
   * Remove Thomas from Uploaders, thanks for working on this
   * rebase patches
   * bump policy and debhelper versions
Checksums-Sha1:
 37e882e4a9c7dacaf599e1c3af789fbcca37cad0 2294 ros-rospack_2.6.2-1.dsc
 aa7d277fd809c0d97dccb56e28b1fe6a3554acc8 74785 ros-rospack_2.6.2.orig.tar.gz
 61d3686858dd688dced51e60f4b83ae6df82bb55 5864 ros-rospack_2.6.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 9c47b3add9a68e26711d3965e1ca5d4ffa38e932 8058 ros-rospack_2.6.2-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 50c0af198867b9d372c7b19e7b01af0b5228b33041297c8d8b82216208155e57 2294 ros-rospack_2.6.2-1.dsc
 85e2cb33ada71eb67d26e84c149f8a5812f9a6e6a1329e4923b95ae74921613a 74785 ros-rospack_2.6.2.orig.tar.gz
 d7a8c94cd73dfac59ca52f752cd5b8a583f0fac64880d254e3a92c770036f86b 5864 ros-rospack_2.6.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 a2a2d0680410f4c5546a3e0e3add6558407f879125d47b953321ad29be9d6126 8058 ros-rospack_2.6.2-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
 e4272e37e9a8204adf974451bfeaf481 2294 libs optional ros-rospack_2.6.2-1.dsc
 dc49a7e87f62b8ed23f2fcc87f858b9c 74785 libs optional ros-rospack_2.6.2.orig.tar.gz
 fbec7b07e728bbb22137480dd80bb902 5864 libs optional ros-rospack_2.6.2-1.debian.tar.xz
 db74ed9018537ff3fd8ab9f1a8cbcd50 8058 libs optional ros-rospack_2.6.2-1_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=5wf0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: