Accepted libgdf 0.1.3-4 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 09:08:52 -0300
Source: libgdf
Architecture: source
Version: 0.1.3-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: NeuroDebian Team <team@neuro.debian.net>
Changed-By: Rafael Laboissière <rafael@debian.org>
Closes: 962217
Changes:
libgdf (0.1.3-4) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Allow stderr in unit tests.
This allows autopkgtest to pass with libboost 1.71, since messages
regarding the deprecation of BOOST_*_ENDIAN BOOST_BYTE_ORDER are
issued at compilation time. This is a quick fix while waiting for the
problem to be fixed upstream. (Closes: #962217)
* d/control:
+ Bump debhelper compatibitlity level to 13
+ Standards-Version to 4.5.0 (no changes needed)
+ Make libgdf-dev Arch: all. The dependencies on libgdf0 are
adjusted for using source:Version, accordingly. Also, adjust
the long description to reflect this change.
+ Add Rules-Requires-Root: no
* d/u/metadata
+ Drop Name and Contact fields
+ Add Repository* and Bug-* fields
* d/rules: Drop --as-needed linker flag
Checksums-Sha1:
a74f097e425463b63820f58b630e16c68463154b 2484 libgdf_0.1.3-4.dsc
65246071d939a9d43079bfaac0b2fcd9004bcb32 6904 libgdf_0.1.3-4.debian.tar.xz
6e8ed75ad68ea31410dc595388a538d18b42fef6 21330 libgdf_0.1.3-4_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
bf417a61edbaeec70ec9cdf971b8ccc9d5a30e7251bd163c7c2097aa6ced0efd 2484 libgdf_0.1.3-4.dsc
f5a7354165229f8a264556ec4fe8d3b08e733da89e0cfe38bb26be2c3ce9210c 6904 libgdf_0.1.3-4.debian.tar.xz
34f9917a68ad37aaf71e7f10b3bcc960d57ae4ec6aefd982d8c1219ea86d82a3 21330 libgdf_0.1.3-4_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
3b53dee718f36ac5748c43248ba1ed0b 2484 libs optional libgdf_0.1.3-4.dsc
d1b466347b7e76ee289cbb66e84316ad 6904 libs optional libgdf_0.1.3-4.debian.tar.xz
f54f2ff06d0d39c85a9cbe93d71d36b0 21330 libs optional libgdf_0.1.3-4_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=rU/z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: