Accepted 9menu 1.10-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 23:06:32 -0500
Source: 9menu
Architecture: source
Version: 1.10-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Daniel Echeverri <epsilon@debian.org>
Changed-By: Daniel Echeverri <epsilon@debian.org>
Changes:
9menu (1.10-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream release.
* Add d/repack.sh script.
* Change my email address and my lastname in debian files.
* Bump standard versions 4.5.0 (no changes).
* Use wrap-and-sort.
* Use debhelper-compat instead of debian/compat.
* Mark Rules-Requires-Root: no as we don't need root for building
* debian/patches
+ Refresh 04_signedness.diff patch.
+ Refresh 05_morekeys.diff patch.
+ Refresh 07_remove-resource-leak.diff patch.
Checksums-Sha1:
fc619ed49db534c6bb4574094085636a680da20a 1703 9menu_1.10-1.dsc
b7a11a618723f40cc41ccad0c4619bcb5d52d445 9104 9menu_1.10.orig.tar.xz
2ac6d7fb43040240a6a0684b8cfa420af016c140 5616 9menu_1.10-1.debian.tar.xz
21b76f2f666cef9513b993bf86fbd568110330d0 6359 9menu_1.10-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
6bee79f1e9a34ef4c4aa90eb30c3aac52bbe9aebe3065ccb9230455a59f6933a 1703 9menu_1.10-1.dsc
f7fb576f469b304b3d431ec83e8f91382312d2f7270f901c248caeb0b2c57285 9104 9menu_1.10.orig.tar.xz
216b0d8e4a7d7f328d63f736a3e371468ec8255ff8485a7959efdf38984253f3 5616 9menu_1.10-1.debian.tar.xz
0ebcb3b2579eb3622e2daafd3183f965feb7af98551c854c35da163c427930b7 6359 9menu_1.10-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
3cd049a7bd47a1752eb280ee452d0711 1703 x11 optional 9menu_1.10-1.dsc
0c1882822731ec9f1cd109ba5f9574ac 9104 x11 optional 9menu_1.10.orig.tar.xz
ca89b6d0122554060f17c8a6b2b0f759 5616 x11 optional 9menu_1.10-1.debian.tar.xz
9133dd41b263201042f1302784cf321a 6359 x11 optional 9menu_1.10-1_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=79rp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: