[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted wf-recorder 0.2.1-1 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:26:30 +0200
Source: wf-recorder
Architecture: source
Version: 0.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Sway and related packages team <team+swaywm@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Birger Schacht <birger@rantanplan.org>
Changes:
 wf-recorder (0.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release
   * d/control:
    + Bump standards version to 4.5.0 (no changes required)
    + Add scdoc to Build-Depends to also build manpages
   * d/upstream:
    + Add bug tracking data to metadata file
Checksums-Sha1:
 391216365aeabbd0e594f2b021792f5ef5884745 2141 wf-recorder_0.2.1-1.dsc
 a025b148f9cecab3e94c3313303033107973104a 22095 wf-recorder_0.2.1.orig.tar.gz
 bb9580cb3690d2c62e85c211511754abb457d1f7 2264 wf-recorder_0.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 23be5c3b6167f3956a47b2a3343495a21ac613a3 12822 wf-recorder_0.2.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 ac936ea3a4392d571bbba78dbed218a2d0560e3bec6923c4b37533f21263850f 2141 wf-recorder_0.2.1-1.dsc
 45cf04cf58cf241c22fa2fbb70481a3747ad33e6930e4bdba7b9cc7018789ad1 22095 wf-recorder_0.2.1.orig.tar.gz
 5c8cc3c665509ea579a41c3b760e8020a76938e09ae605c1ecdd4ee0bfae927c 2264 wf-recorder_0.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 b80b17edd873e98b2ef7dc611925c1c72f26b712ebd60501707fffcc53df420b 12822 wf-recorder_0.2.1-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 dfb5166511aae921786235940afbdffa 2141 x11 optional wf-recorder_0.2.1-1.dsc
 d4eb9bc60ac7e564936ba6589617b41c 22095 x11 optional wf-recorder_0.2.1.orig.tar.gz
 4acf3feab9e4f8b0b158c161db699a35 2264 x11 optional wf-recorder_0.2.1-1.debian.tar.xz
 b9a89aabcb824d3f5a2459804d5c37ba 12822 x11 optional wf-recorder_0.2.1-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=f6hf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: