[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted cmark 0.29.0-2 (source) into unstable



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 19:06:19 +0200
Source: cmark
Architecture: source
Version: 0.29.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
Changed-By: Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk>
Closes: 954541
Changes:
 cmark (0.29.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.5.0
   * use debhelper compatibility level 12 (not 11);
     build-depend on debhelper-compat (not debhelper)
   * add patch cherry-picked upstream
     to use html.escape instead of cgi.escape in normalize test,
     fixing FTBFS;
     closes: 954541, thanks to Lucas Nussbaum and Hubert Chathi
   * mark lib* packages Multi-Arch: same
Checksums-Sha1:
 361e1757d65803d27a03ee6e2fea176756863cb4 1923 cmark_0.29.0-2.dsc
 17264f2eba2f170e5900781f8afefa0b237b1d01 10204 cmark_0.29.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 14de3c125355a197f2c4fe5682291075f3e1dd3d 7844 cmark_0.29.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 e140a1fa2dc6a5cf3c183d23607924d22f183c2d70119bdc29b0309a9c9769c4 1923 cmark_0.29.0-2.dsc
 e67f3cbdc343465abf50f080a9a768c8c8c968ade346344da7a0f0343cf99247 10204 cmark_0.29.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 d93da85eb7bd1f65abd3cf7cef95c265aa028b69831dcc640dc1ef99801e2201 7844 cmark_0.29.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 0b05fe5d08073c1ed4eccf866155fc58 1923 text optional cmark_0.29.0-2.dsc
 08ac87b186d60aa312044271a0199f3e 10204 text optional cmark_0.29.0-2.debian.tar.xz
 d4950ff1091fb8ac8da8e2295df7e232 7844 text optional cmark_0.29.0-2_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=sgoZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: