Accepted postfix 3.5.0-1 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 16:32:19 -0400
Source: postfix
Architecture: source
Version: 3.5.0-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: LaMont Jones <lamont@debian.org>
Changed-By: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
Changes:
postfix (3.5.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[Scott Kitterman]
.
* Drop debian/patches/80_glibc2.30-ftbfs.diff, incorporated upstream
* Refresh patches
.
[Wietse Venema]
.
* 3.5.0
Checksums-Sha1:
ea8fa391287510f59dc73d13a53e3691b8622db5 2997 postfix_3.5.0-1.dsc
5f7d5b04c856fa3c893dfe19b693613aad712b12 4609501 postfix_3.5.0.orig.tar.gz
58df7720bc83a0f15d8160a4b97c4c358b2f634f 220 postfix_3.5.0.orig.tar.gz.asc
0a10b16083030c9036b4e8735385c7f01f70a4d8 203816 postfix_3.5.0-1.debian.tar.xz
ce04f93ac18aea5802e67cb722bc62b78ff3e5fd 7109 postfix_3.5.0-1_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
577e577081d3d95c957017256d45aff88564fe47e1ddce76df0ed89b0cf89111 2997 postfix_3.5.0-1.dsc
22ac929733449a294252ac8deda4b264ff48a997ff3847007291a2ee53ef55cc 4609501 postfix_3.5.0.orig.tar.gz
054b499840bdbe0b295c323a64c854957450e9b2a01555b4cb9f55d170c87d1b 220 postfix_3.5.0.orig.tar.gz.asc
e4924066b52a4e87af1d7037f4db9de4bb9e983f9024058a9e5a14386cc580f0 203816 postfix_3.5.0-1.debian.tar.xz
4b950d580f263a95e5466bc573476f8a58a1cc1f805ada7e4ac1f4f032693a9d 7109 postfix_3.5.0-1_source.buildinfo
Files:
ade9df4f0acd072511b93468f6709e31 2997 mail optional postfix_3.5.0-1.dsc
f6a48f369cf8d693d7b0f8ab51f0fc9b 4609501 mail optional postfix_3.5.0.orig.tar.gz
05406e1ff970c2c55f2d5955112d59f8 220 mail optional postfix_3.5.0.orig.tar.gz.asc
4527f942647a5760516a7e5639915b79 203816 mail optional postfix_3.5.0-1.debian.tar.xz
704d76b40a5ee6a802dbeeef36d2009c 7109 mail optional postfix_3.5.0-1_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=7TQk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: