Accepted mender-client 2.2.0-2 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 16:01:56 +0100
Source: mender-client
Architecture: source
Version: 2.2.0-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Go Packaging Team <team+pkg-go@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Lluis Campos <lluis.campos@northern.tech>
Changes:
mender-client (2.2.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Andreas Henriksson ]
* Add d/p/0004-Also-fix-app-test.go-pointer-to-map-confusion.patch
.
[ Lluis Campos ]
* Recreate d/p/0001-Skip-TestLicense to avoid mendertesting dependency
* Add d/p/0005-Skip-test-TestBinarySize-N.A.-for-Debian-build.patch
* Add d/p/0006-Fix-pointer-to-map-confusion-in-modules_test.go.patch
* Add d/p/0007-Skip-TestMainExitCodes-test-it-fails-autopkgtest-on-.patch
* Add d/p/0008-Generate-an-error... and d/p/0009-MEN-3277-Fix-check...
- Fixes: CLI options -check-update and -send-inventory do not work (See #953635)
- Fixes: Salsa CI autopkgtest aborts while running TestCheckUpdate unit test
Checksums-Sha1:
a3d705658975eedf48954787f1018d4e37ea7ea5 2563 mender-client_2.2.0-2.dsc
d6b8eaa1dadedb16c4e1d3f1564cc9217d86ba44 11832 mender-client_2.2.0-2.debian.tar.xz
c5e795f011216727932dfb89b9203ce0209ee8c4 7539 mender-client_2.2.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
c9efe6eb374ed76d68f168ac320a681662d8dfada03baf956353953591cda7a2 2563 mender-client_2.2.0-2.dsc
ce19bc774c10796ddd2b447708124cc75ac1034dcd40dc058fdfdb1284009031 11832 mender-client_2.2.0-2.debian.tar.xz
147305877c989bf051d1548eb89e1586e081ee2be655139546532c4918ae4f3a 7539 mender-client_2.2.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
c8879748d6406f8c1ab8b765141980f7 2563 devel optional mender-client_2.2.0-2.dsc
e437707d695e2d4d6f82c59598025c00 11832 devel optional mender-client_2.2.0-2.debian.tar.xz
2f0bd5b0f01b0f2d458f09111e62791b 7539 devel optional mender-client_2.2.0-2_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=D0cG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: