Accepted recoverdm 0.20-7 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 16:24:03 -0300
Source: recoverdm
Architecture: source
Version: 0.20-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Security Tools <team+pkg-security@tracker.debian.org>
Changed-By: Thiago Andrade Marques <thmarques@gmail.com>
Changes:
recoverdm (0.20-7) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Thiago Andrade Marques ]
* Team upload.
* Using new DH level format. Consequently:
- debian/compat: removed.
- debian/control: changed from 'debhelper' to 'debhelper-compat' in
Build-Depends field and bumped level to 12.
* debian/control:
- Added 'Rules-Requires-Root: no' to source stanza.
- Bumped Standards-Version to 4.5.0.
* debian/copyright: added packaging rights to me and Samuel Henrique.
* debian/patches/40_dev-c.patch: added to fix a notice of failure to declare
a function in the build.
* debian/rules: added dh_verbose.
* debian/watch: added the GitHub as source.
.
[ Samuel Henrique ]
* Team upload.
* Add salsa-ci.yml.
* Configure git-buildpackage for Debian.
Checksums-Sha1:
4e2bbbc4f03666fb782d6a69e05a3b9b778c8af9 1893 recoverdm_0.20-7.dsc
de1947f86a8884f93844fac3917fba92d3b0a15c 7588 recoverdm_0.20-7.debian.tar.xz
977d22211e5433b1b8ba5cdd59ceb0e43e1a2e58 5454 recoverdm_0.20-7_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
add4b32d3ae6843aed423ebca386c09d3c624a38682e394d3b8c209370b5a3f7 1893 recoverdm_0.20-7.dsc
d6b82ba5228b17681961f2b651dc4a2e5054bcc6174e7cc474b3eebbf9336b92 7588 recoverdm_0.20-7.debian.tar.xz
681ba8646d7e7af462b22acece9673410f1380acc4e5a305542a801e41548cd3 5454 recoverdm_0.20-7_source.buildinfo
Files:
4ef70fde91a7482b676ef55e17f3369e 1893 utils optional recoverdm_0.20-7.dsc
3093f8d5e7b0156442db2ce14051cc26 7588 utils optional recoverdm_0.20-7.debian.tar.xz
8155cd22cc712012f0dc7fc05f71d33c 5454 utils optional recoverdm_0.20-7_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=jODn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: