Accepted ruby-concurrent 1.1.6+dfsg-3 (source) into unstable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:16:50 +0530
Source: ruby-concurrent
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1.6+dfsg-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers <pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Pirate Praveen <praveen@debian.org>
Changes:
ruby-concurrent (1.1.6+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Tighten dependency on ruby-concurrent to same version as source
* Fix version of concurrent-ruby-edge gem (not same as concurrent-ruby)
* Run dh_install for both binary packages in override target
* Remove git from concurrent-ruby-edge gemspec as well (fixes broken gempsec)
* Add myself to uploaders
* Check gemspec dependencies for all gemspec
Checksums-Sha1:
3842042e4b1ccba88f01493af1a0c6ec9ddd0109 2302 ruby-concurrent_1.1.6+dfsg-3.dsc
5ff92cae3e985f54f9311a245b9853e45def6540 5556 ruby-concurrent_1.1.6+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz
47272728e13480dd9accd973add2d16ca4729fa0 14010 ruby-concurrent_1.1.6+dfsg-3_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
a36e74052fb5095de3c94e7b790c3321e0f43c28b3a210763c935a9258ebd5be 2302 ruby-concurrent_1.1.6+dfsg-3.dsc
a433632b91f1d740879e88d0a341b1de0a4412d7a0e95555ec994fffc3d78295 5556 ruby-concurrent_1.1.6+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz
c2b387ff1c4dfcaee94bc336a1333004e14cfc04b6df11138b221cfc522e8139 14010 ruby-concurrent_1.1.6+dfsg-3_source.buildinfo
Files:
af96d94d273cdc833282c0d8ce07c182 2302 ruby optional ruby-concurrent_1.1.6+dfsg-3.dsc
78cefdcf9df7e848b11afc6072f43a24 5556 ruby optional ruby-concurrent_1.1.6+dfsg-3.debian.tar.xz
2380b9fd890aabc75a52a67e43a8d5f3 14010 ruby optional ruby-concurrent_1.1.6+dfsg-3_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=i2VD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: